Re: [racket] policy on providing version for ffi-lib

2011-05-05 Thread Jay McCarthy
I just updated the package too. Jay 2011/5/3 Matthew Flatt : > I've pushed a rewrite for the `ffi-lib' docs. The rewrite encourages a > list of version numbers, if only to hold a single version number > followed by `#f' (i.e., a versionless library as a fallback). > > At Mon, 2 May 2011 19:20:54

Re: [racket] policy on providing version for ffi-lib

2011-05-04 Thread D Herring
On 05/02/2011 07:20 PM, Danny Yoo wrote: I notice that Sqlite's library is usually installed as 'libsqlite3.so.0' on a user's system, but the sqlite PLaneT package: ... appears to assume that the library is named libsqlite3.so. Some of the major linux distributions (e.g. RedHat/Centos) have b

Re: [racket] policy on providing version for ffi-lib

2011-05-03 Thread Matthew Flatt
I've pushed a rewrite for the `ffi-lib' docs. The rewrite encourages a list of version numbers, if only to hold a single version number followed by `#f' (i.e., a versionless library as a fallback). At Mon, 2 May 2011 19:20:54 -0400, Danny Yoo wrote: > I notice that Sqlite's library is usually inst

[racket] policy on providing version for ffi-lib

2011-05-02 Thread Danny Yoo
I notice that Sqlite's library is usually installed as 'libsqlite3.so.0' on a user's system, but the sqlite PLaneT package: http://planet.racket-lang.org/display.ss?package=sqlite.plt&owner=jaymccarthy appears to assume that the library is named libsqlite3.so. J G Cho ran across this a week