The `=defun` macro introduces the `*cont*` binding as the argument of
`=foo`. Hygienic macro expansion ensures that this macro-introduced
bindings does not capture uses of `*cont*` that appear in the macro
use. Specifically, the `*cont*` in
(=defun (foo x) *cont*)
refers to the module-level de
I’m trying to resolve why I get differing results in a let form when using a
macro versus using the expanded function version. Here’s an example using
racket 5.93:
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax racket/syntax))
(define *cont* identity)
(define-syntax (=defun stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
2 matches
Mail list logo
