On Jun 20, Robby Findler wrote:
> Yes, that's the right place; it appears to the results of a recent
> nightly build (not one with the change I pushed today tho).
Yes, a new build happens once every day, starting around 4am EST.
> It still needs to be updated to the new website, tho. Not sure wh
Yes, that's the right place; it appears to the results of a recent
nightly build (not one with the change I pushed today tho).
It still needs to be updated to the new website, tho. Not sure when
that's going to happen; I'll alert the relevant folks.
Thanks,
Robby
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:29 PM
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 18:25, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Laurent
> wrote:
> >> That worked, but there is one annoying thing: it recompiled *all* the
> >> dependencies, including the whole Racket...
> >> Is
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Laurent wrote:
>> That worked, but there is one annoying thing: it recompiled *all* the
>> dependencies, including the whole Racket...
>> Is there a way to avoid this with this function?
>
> This is a bad int
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Laurent wrote:
> That worked, but there is one annoying thing: it recompiled *all* the
> dependencies, including the whole Racket...
> Is there a way to avoid this with this function?
This is a bad interaction between drracket's automatic compilation
setup and the
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:55, Laurent wrote:
> I also used `remove-pkg', but it also seemed to recompile more than needed
> (although a lot less than install-pkg). This time I did not stop it.
> It removed the package, but then when I tried to re-execute the file where
> which holds my call to r
I also used `remove-pkg', but it also seemed to recompile more than needed
(although a lot less than install-pkg). This time I did not stop it.
It removed the package, but then when I tried to re-execute the file where
which holds my call to remove-pkg, I get the following error:
procedure get-com
> Also, there should be somewhere in this function call where I should have
> put my username I guess, but where?
>
> [...]
>(get-package-spec "planet" ; no need to change that I suppose ?
>
>
Hmm, I changed "planet" to my username, which is made obvious in your
documentation...
But it still r
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 23:30, Robby Findler wrote:
> It isn't clear to me why the functions are doing what they are doing
> in some of the details, but I've documented the relevant missing ones
> (now pushed, also as below). Here is an example to help you get going.
>
> #lang racket
> (require pl
It isn't clear to me why the functions are doing what they are doing
in some of the details, but I've documented the relevant missing ones
(now pushed, also as below). Here is an example to help you get going.
#lang racket
(require planet/util)
(install-pkg
(get-package-spec "planet"
Hi,
Is there a function in planet/util that does the same job as "fileinject"?
There is a remove-pkg function but I don't see a install-pkg.
Actually, I found one such (undocumented) function in "resolver.rkt", but
I'm not sure how to use the 'pkg' argument :
(install-pkg pkg path maj min)
Can a
11 matches
Mail list logo
