cute!
thanks,
-- Éric
On Apr 21, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Here's a quick little example using `prop:procedure':
>
> https://gist.github.com/935350
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
>> Ah, this is wonderful!
>>
>> not only does it exist, but in a
Here's a quick little example using `prop:procedure':
https://gist.github.com/935350
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Ah, this is wonderful!
>
> not only does it exist, but in a better way than I had dreamed of ;-)
> I wish I had known about that long ago...
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Ah, this is wonderful!
not only does it exist, but in a better way than I had dreamed of ;-)
I wish I had known about that long ago...
Thanks!
-- Éric
On Apr 21, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Eric Tanter wrote at 04/21/2011 04:55 PM:
>> Something along the lines of:
>> (lambda #:pr
Hi,
Maybe this is not what you want, but just in case:
structs can be used as procedures (with the #:prop:procedure property).
You can use the attributes of the struct to attach the properties you want.
Laurent
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 22:55, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Hi Racketeers,
>
> I have been
Eric Tanter wrote at 04/21/2011 04:55 PM:
Something along the lines of:
(lambda #:prop key val (x) x)
and then have `procedure-properties' as means to retrieve the different
properties for introspection.
One thing that might serve your needs is to define a struct that can be
applied like p
Hi Racketeers,
I have been using PLT Scheme/Racket for various kinds of language design
experiments in the past few years. The different facilities (in particular the
possibility to redefine #%app, identifier macros, etc.) are extremely valuable
to get working prototypes of wild ideas very quic
6 matches
Mail list logo
