-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-01-12 16:55, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Marijn wrote:
>
>> Basically, my idea was to transform:
>>
>> (dependent-boxes ((a) (b (* 2 a)) (c (+ 2 a b
>>
>> into something which would automatically propagate c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-01-12 22:50, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 11 hours ago, Marijn wrote:
>> It took me a while to understand what you're saying here, but if
>> I am not mistaken you're saying that the result of the
>> macro-expansion is a function-application with `let*'
11 hours ago, Marijn wrote:
> It took me a while to understand what you're saying here, but if I
> am not mistaken you're saying that the result of the macro-expansion
> is a function-application with `let*' (or `for/hash') in the
> function position. Then when #%app looks that name up in the
> env
Yesterday, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Would syntax/parse have done better?
For what Marijn does, I think that he'd end up with the same error.
IME, every time I've seen a code walker they're an indication of
either not knowing how to use the macro system well enough, or if
there's no way to d
On Jan 4, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Marijn wrote:
> Basically,
> my idea was to transform:
>
> (dependent-boxes
> ((a)
>(b (* 2 a))
>(c (+ 2 a b
>
> into something which would automatically propagate changes in any
> cell/box to any other box which was dependent on it. Pretty much
> exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-01-12 10:57, Marijn wrote:
> On 03-01-12 20:15, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> Two hours ago, Marijn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> for/hash is giving me a syntax-error, but the error is in
>>> macro-expanded code which is not shown by default and which is
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-01-12 20:15, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two hours ago, Marijn wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for/hash is giving me a syntax-error, but the error is in
>> macro-expanded code which is not shown by default and which is
>> also seemingly inaccessible via the macr
Would syntax/parse have done better?
On Jan 3, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two hours ago, Marijn wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for/hash is giving me a syntax-error, but the error is in
>> macro-expanded code which is not shown by default and which is also
>> seemingly inaccessible via the m
Two hours ago, Marijn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for/hash is giving me a syntax-error, but the error is in
> macro-expanded code which is not shown by default and which is also
> seemingly inaccessible via the macro-stepper. The for/hash
> expression works outside my macro, so I guess it's my fault, but it
Hi,
for/hash is giving me a syntax-error, but the error is in macro-expanded
code which is not shown by default and which is also seemingly
inaccessible via the macro-stepper. The for/hash expression works
outside my macro, so I guess it's my fault, but it would help if the
syntax-error could be a
10 matches
Mail list logo