At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:45:23 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Aha, that was indeed part of the problem, thanks. Now it works for
> absolute paths. For relative paths it gets hung up part way;
I've pushed a repair for relative paths. Thanks for the report!
Racket Users list:
Laurent writes:
> Just in case, as Matthew once told me, you need all instances of DrRacket
> to be run with --single-instance, not just the new instance.
>
Aha, that was indeed part of the problem, thanks. Now it works for
absolute paths. For relative paths it gets hung up part way; a new
windo
Just in case, as Matthew once told me, you need all instances of DrRacket
to be run with --single-instance, not just the new instance.
Laurent
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:44 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Matthew Flatt writes:
>
> > Do you have "libunique-1.0" installed?
> >
> > I intended to make
Matthew Flatt writes:
> Do you have "libunique-1.0" installed?
>
> I intended to make `-singleInstance` log an error when "libunique-1.0"
> is not found, but I think I never got around to it.
>
I assume I just need it at run time? I just installed it, and following
seems to work, but -singleInst
ebian. According to the docs shipped with racket,
> "drracket -singleInstance bar.rkt" should open bar.rkt in an existing
> drracket process. This seems not to be the case for me. Is this a bug?
> Or a feature that got dropped?
>
> d
>
> __
Hi all;
I'm running 5.3.6 on Debian. According to the docs shipped with racket,
"drracket -singleInstance bar.rkt" should open bar.rkt in an existing
drracket process. This seems not to be the case for me. Is this a bug?
Or a feature that got dropped?
d
6 matches
Mail list logo
