At Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:45:29 +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Using `dynamic-wind' turns out not to be enough if you have with
> multiple threads:
>
> (GUI) (...)(...)
> | ||
> (button push) (B) (C)
>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:45:29 +
From: Taylor R Campbell
What should I do if I want to preclude only multiple uses of the
continuation, but still allow single uses even if they are non-local?
Sorry, should've spent half a minute thinking about that before making
my message even
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:42:56 -0600
From: Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:56:16 +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> First, is there any document generally describing the rationale for
> the design of continuation barriers and advice about when to use them?
No, so here's an
At Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:56:16 +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> I have several questions about continuation barriers. I have tested
> some examples in PLT Scheme v4.2.4, because that's what I have handy;
> if the semantics has changed significantly in Racket, let me know
> before wasting time with t
(I am not subscribed to this list, so please cc me in replies.)
I have several questions about continuation barriers. I have tested
some examples in PLT Scheme v4.2.4, because that's what I have handy;
if the semantics has changed significantly in Racket, let me know
before wasting time with the
5 matches
Mail list logo
