Re: [racket] define-syntax comment

2014-03-06 Thread Neil Toronto
On 03/06/2014 06:15 PM, Jon Stenerson wrote: When I run this in DrRacket, the first (m) gives 0 and the second gives #. #lang racket (m) (define-syntax m (lambda (stx) #'+)) (m) Seems a little strange to me. I see why it happens but I guess I had expected a "use before definition" warning. Th

[racket] define-syntax comment

2014-03-06 Thread Jon Stenerson
When I run this in DrRacket, the first (m) gives 0 and the second gives #. #lang racket (m) (define-syntax m (lambda (stx) #'+)) (m) Seems a little strange to me. I see why it happens but I guess I had expected a "use before definition" warning. Racket Users list: htt