Re: [racket] current-module-name-resolver and syntax/docprovide

2014-06-06 Thread Greg Hendershott
Thank you for the explanation Matthew, that all makes sense to me now. Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Re: [racket] current-module-name-resolver and syntax/docprovide

2014-06-05 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:15:26 -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote: > After stumbling across the syntax/docprovide module [...] > > To back up a step: Is syntax/docprovide something that is intended to > be used these days? No. It was a very early experiment. Like so many early Racket experiments, it was

[racket] current-module-name-resolver and syntax/docprovide

2014-06-05 Thread Greg Hendershott
After stumbling across the syntax/docprovide module in the documentation, and trying to use it, I discovered this error: #lang racket/base (require syntax/docprovide) (let ([orig-resolver (current-module-name-resolver)]) (parameterize ([current-module-name-resolver (case-lambda