Re: [racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image

2010-06-25 Thread Robby Findler
-Scheme Mailing List > Subject: [racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image > > > > There are a whole lot of graphics operations in 2htdp/image, and many of > them come in pairs: overlay/xy and place-image, add-line and scene+line, > add-curve and scene+curve, etc. that differ

Re: [racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image

2010-06-25 Thread Paul Ojanen
primitives in 2htdp/image There are a whole lot of graphics operations in 2htdp/image, and many of them come in pairs: overlay/xy and place-image, add-line and scene+line, add-curve and scene+curve, etc. that differ mainly in whether or not they crop the result to the bounding box of one of the images

Re: [racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image

2010-06-25 Thread Matthias Felleisen
The names were chosen for backwards compatibility. -- Matthias On Jun 25, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote: > There are a whole lot of graphics operations in 2htdp/image, and many of them > come in pairs: overlay/xy and place-image, add-line and scene+line, add-curve > and scene+curve,

[racket] confusing graphics primitives in 2htdp/image

2010-06-25 Thread Stephen Bloch
There are a whole lot of graphics operations in 2htdp/image, and many of them come in pairs: overlay/xy and place-image, add-line and scene +line, add-curve and scene+curve, etc. that differ mainly in whether or not they crop the result to the bounding box of one of the images. (They someti