On 2011-09-14 16:14:50 -0500, Jeremy Kun wrote:
>Are there any other significant naming conventions I may run across?
>perhaps using some of ~ @ $ ^ & . _ + = . Is it considered bad form to use
>full UTF characters in identifiers?
If you use Racket's OO facilities you'll see:
potato%
Jeremy, hello.
On 2011 Sep 14, at 22:14, Jeremy Kun wrote:
> Are there any other significant naming conventions I may run across? perhaps
> using some of ~ @ $ ^ & . _ + = . Is it considered bad form to use full UTF
> characters in identifiers?
I've asked this same question in the past, and t
Pronounce the "/" as "with", and it usually makes sense. Sometimes it's
for a variation of a behavior, or composition of behaviors, sometimes
it's just as shorthand for the word "with", and sometimes it's something
else. You might use "/" a little less often, now that you have keyword
argumen
As I get deeper and deeper into Racket I notice a lot of interesting
identifiers that seem to follow a naming convention, but I can't figure out
what the convention is.
For instance, extract-binding/single seems to use the slash to indicate that
it only returns a single value, as opposed to a list
4 matches
Mail list logo
