Re: [racket] TR Parameterization Question

2012-11-02 Thread Ray Racine
Got it. Thanks for taking the time to clarify it for me. Ray On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Ray Racine wrote: > > The immediate below works for me. It nags in the sense that S1 has a > > irrelevant type parameter. > > Below I atte

Re: [racket] TR Parameterization Question

2012-11-02 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Ray Racine wrote: > The immediate below works for me. It nags in the sense that S1 has a > irrelevant type parameter. > Below I attempt to shift the type parameter inside, which the TR parse > happily allows. However, later things fall apart. > > One interpretatio

[racket] TR Parameterization Question

2012-11-02 Thread Ray Racine
The immediate below works for me. It nags in the sense that S1 has a irrelevant type parameter. Below I attempt to shift the type parameter inside, which the TR parse happily allows. However, later things fall apart. One interpretation of what I'm tying to do is: S0 encodes a Collection of T, S1