ruct-name
>| (old-struct-name new-struct-name)
> fields-op ::=
> | #:only-fields [fld-form ...]
> fld-form ::= field-name-form
>| [#:no-mutator field-name-form]
>| [#:no-accessor field-name-form]
> fld-name-form ::= field-na
how to get this all to work. I'd need some mflatt
guidance.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tobin-Hochstadt"
To: "J. Ian Johnson"
Cc: "users"
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:18:58 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket] Struct fields i
Sounds good. I'll pin this email for when I can get back to it.
Thanks,
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
To: J. Ian Johnson
Cc: users
Sent: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:18:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [racket] Struct fields in struct-info + match enhancements
Here
n
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sam Tobin-Hochstadt"
> To: "J. Ian Johnson"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:42:56 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [racket] Struct fields in struct-info + match enhancements
&g
Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:42:56 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket] Struct fields in struct-info + match enhancements
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:35 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> tl;dr if you use struct-info in your programs, I might break them. Please
> continue reading.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:35 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> tl;dr if you use struct-info in your programs, I might break them. Please
> continue reading.
>
> I had a PR a while ago suggesting a change to struct-copy due to its
> unhygienic nature with fields. It did not go through since there wasn
tl;dr if you use struct-info in your programs, I might break them. Please
continue reading.
I had a PR a while ago suggesting a change to struct-copy due to its unhygienic
nature with fields. It did not go through since there wasn't enough information
in the struct-info to separate the struct-n
7 matches
Mail list logo
