Re: [racket] SMathML Support in Racket

2010-08-18 Thread Karl Winterling
Google lhs2TeX. _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Re: [racket] SMathML Support in Racket

2010-08-15 Thread Jens Axel Søgaard
2010/8/15 Karl Winterling : > Based > on my biased judgment and possibly arrogant personal tastes, I strongly > believe that functional Lisp semantics would work well for manipulating and > rendering mathematical structures. S-expressions give us a convenient way to > write content-sensitive mathe

Re: [racket] SMathML Support in Racket

2010-08-15 Thread Karl Winterling
I realize that I meant to say "Yes" because it is too much to hope. _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Re: [racket] SMathML Support in Racket

2010-08-15 Thread Karl Winterling
I happen to spend most of my time not programming or reading Racket documentation, so the answer to your question is "No." _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Re: [racket] SMathML Support in Racket

2010-08-15 Thread Shriram Krishnamurthi
Is it too much to hope that your experiments involve Scribble? _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

[racket] SMathML Support in Racket

2010-08-15 Thread Karl Winterling
Greetings Racketeers, For some reason (perhaps because I have nonexistent fine motor skills) I've always had issues with programs for writing math on the computer. It seems like most of this software is either overly neglected by its developers (i.e., it's been in beta or experimental stage fo