Yes, the 64-bit linux build will use Ubuntu 12.04 starting with Racket v6.0.
Ryan
On 01/28/2014 04:16 AM, Tobias Hammer wrote:
Great new version!
I noticed that there is only a build for ubuntu platform. Will at least
one of the other (older distribution) ones come back? Also the builds
for u
I haven't updated the ppa in a while. There is something wrong with the current
packaging scripts and I don't have a lot of time to debug it. If anyone wants
to help please let me know.
On 01/28/2014 02:52 AM, Todd O'Bryan wrote:
> I use the Racket ppa. Hopefully, the new version will appear the
I use the Racket ppa. Hopefully, the new version will appear there
shortly. To use:
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:plt/racket
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install racket
You have to wait a bit for the maintainer to put together the .deb
file, but I think it's worth it.
Todd
On Tue, Jan 2
Great new version!
I noticed that there is only a build for ubuntu platform. Will at least
one of the other (older distribution) ones come back? Also the builds for
ubuntu have different versions for 32 and 64 bit. 32bit is fine with the
12.04 LTS, which is the newest LTS. But all the 64bit
On Jan 26, 2014 4:15 PM, "Martin DeMello" wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>>
>> Racket 5.92 has a new package system, including a catalog of
>> hundreds of already-available packages. Please visit
>>
>> http://pkgs.racket-lang.org/
>>
>> for an overview of th
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Racket 5.92 has a new package system, including a catalog of
> hundreds of already-available packages. Please visit
>
> http://pkgs.racket-lang.org/
>
> for an overview of the packages.
>
Exciting :) Quick question: a few of the entries
Hi Ryan,
Could the following be added please so that it is available with 6.0?
openssl will not be loaded in Fedora 19 and 20.
(require openssl) fails and ssl-load-fail-reason shows:
"ffi-lib: couldn't open \"libcrypto.so\" (libcrypto.so: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or direct
We hope to release 6.0 in a short amount of time if 5.92 goes okay. We
wanted time for a slightly wider circle to try things out before the big
6-oh.
Robby
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <
i...@juanfra.info> wrote:
> Thanks for the work on the new version :D
>
>
Thanks for the work on the new version :D
I'm using the "builtpkgs" tarball. Everything works OK. The only problem
is PLT_SETUP_OPTIONS="-j 2" breaks the "make install" step.
Just a question. Why "5.92"? Why not "6"?.
On 01/25/14 18:55, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
Racket 5.92 has a new package sys
Erich Rast wrote at 01/25/2014 01:36 PM:
Is there a roadmap about Planet support, i.e. when will existing Planet
packages cease to work?
As another Racket user, I'm fairly confident that a PLaneT server and
"require" forms will remain around for a long time. (Worst case, if PLT
ever got
We don't plan to improve or otherwise change any of the planet packages,
but we do plan to maintain backwards compatibility so that future versions
of racket will continue to run that code as well as it has been doing.
Robby
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Erich Rast wrote:
> Fantastic! Con
Fantastic! Congratulations!
One more question about the new package system:
Is there a roadmap about Planet support, i.e. when will existing Planet
packages cease to work?
"foreseeable future" is a bit vague. I'm developing very slowly due
to lack of spare-time and have a mid-size application wi
Racket 5.92 has a new package system, including a catalog of
hundreds of already-available packages. Please visit
http://pkgs.racket-lang.org/
for an overview of the packages.
Recent releases included the "beta" versions of the package system.
Racket version 5.92 incorporates many improvement
13 matches
Mail list logo
