On 02/16/2011 12:35 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 12:35 PM, Sam Phillips wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>>> In case its not clear from my other email, the racket ppa now supports 5.1.
>>>
>>> https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/racket
>> Would it be possible
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 06:57:54PM +, James Vega wrote:
> writes:
>
> >
> > May I request a Debian package?
>
> FWIW, there's work[0] on updating the official Debian package. The
> 5.0.2 upload was rejected due to the package not fully documenting the
> licenses used in the source. Davi
writes:
>
> May I request a Debian package?
FWIW, there's work[0] on updating the official Debian package. The
5.0.2 upload was rejected due to the package not fully documenting the
licenses used in the source. David Bremner's currently auditing the
source to fix that and there shouldn't be
I think Eli is saying that you should follow the naming conventions
established by the download page and, if so, I'd like to second that.
Robby
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> An hour ago, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>> On 02/16/2011 12:35 PM, Sam Phillips wrote:
>> > Would it be p
An hour ago, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 12:35 PM, Sam Phillips wrote:
> > Would it be possible to build a non-gui package that wouldn't need
> > all of the X11 stuff?
> >
> Yea that should be pretty easy, racket dynamically loads all the gui
> stuff so the package just has to not require gu
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 12:35 PM, Sam Phillips wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>>> In case its not clear from my other email, the racket ppa now supports 5.1.
>>>
>>> https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/racket
>> Would it
On 02/16/2011 12:35 PM, Sam Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>> In case its not clear from my other email, the racket ppa now supports 5.1.
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/racket
> Would it be possible to build a non-gui package that wouldn't need all
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> In case its not clear from my other email, the racket ppa now supports 5.1.
>
> https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/racket
Would it be possible to build a non-gui package that wouldn't need all of the
X11 stuff?
Cheers,
Sam
__
On 02/16/2011 09:31 AM, m...@goblin.punk.net wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:41:22PM -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>> In case its not clear from my other email, the racket ppa now supports 5.1.
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/racket
> I'm not familiar with Launchpad and PPA. Will it work
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:41:22PM -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> In case its not clear from my other email, the racket ppa now supports 5.1.
>
> https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/racket
I'm not familiar with Launchpad and PPA. Will it work with
Debian sid? Debian and Ubuntu use incompatible sof
In case its not clear from my other email, the racket ppa now supports 5.1.
https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/racket
On 02/15/2011 09:41 AM, m...@goblin.punk.net wrote:
> May I request a Debian package?
>
> Mike
> _
> For list-related administr
May I request a Debian package?
Mike
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
Racket version 5.1 is now available from
http://racket-lang.org/
The most significant change in version 5.1 is a rewrite of the GUI
library:
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2010/12/racket-version-5.html
Unix/X users will see the biggest difference with this change,
because DrRacket and all Rack
13 matches
Mail list logo
