On Aug 6, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> 2014-08-06 16:10 GMT+02:00 Robby Findler :
>> I think this is awesome too!
>>
>> Is there some way we can use this to help make Racket better, do you think?
>
> That wasn't the motivation per se, but it might have some potential uses.
> A
> Whalesong do not interpret the bytecodes directly, so I didn't
> look for hints there.
(Note: there was a preliminary simulator used for test cases in
2bc4b2a224fe7a485a1060c69ebde925cecdeb05)
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
2014-08-06 16:10 GMT+02:00 Robby Findler :
> I think this is awesome too!
>
> Is there some way we can use this to help make Racket better, do you think?
That wasn't the motivation per se, but it might have some potential uses.
A simple application would be to collect statistics of the bytecodes u
2014-08-06 16:07 GMT+02:00 Jay McCarthy :
> This is awesome, Jens.
>
> I'd like to have more Racket VMs for experiments like JavaScript and
> LLVM (to get on to iOS better?). I wonder if you were able to use the
> Whalesong bytecode interpreter during the coding of this?
Whalesong do not interpret
I think this is awesome too!
Is there some way we can use this to help make Racket better, do you think?
Would it be useful as a test oracle? Is there a way to maybe
re-interpret the function definitions (say put them into a different
"#lang") you've written to get some kind of a cool random byte
This is awesome, Jens.
I'd like to have more Racket VMs for experiments like JavaScript and
LLVM (to get on to iOS better?). I wonder if you were able to use the
Whalesong bytecode interpreter during the coding of this?
Jay
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi All,
To see how Racket's bytecodes work I have implemented an evaluator in Racket.
The best feature is the extensive amount of comments.
https://github.com/soegaard/meta/blob/master/runtime/racket-eval.rkt
Comments and patches are welcome,
Jens Axel Søgaard
Racket User
No problem, glad to have referred you to the paper, I hope it'll be useful.
Just for everybody else on the list, the paper URL is
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/6334
> On Oct 19, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Petr Samarin wrote:
>
> To be more specific, initially I want to replace the Java VM in JOP
I'd be interested in hearing how it's going!
Just curious, are you reusing ideas from Scheme-79, or starting off in an
entirely different direction? From your original email, I assume you're using
JOP as a springing board?
Alex
> On Oct 19, 2013, at 4:32 AM, Petr Samarin wrote:
>
> First I w
To be more specific, initially I want to replace the Java VM in JOP with a
Racket VM.
JOP is great as a starting point because it has many useful things available
from the start: support for USB and serial interfaces to load the bytecode from
the PC, memory interfaces, floating point unit.
I ha
First I want to develop a small core (probably written in VHDL) that supports a
subset of Racket's bytecode.
I don't want to target any specific board/FPGA so that it can be used anywhere.
But during development I will be testing the core on the board that I have at
home (DE2-70 from Terrasic).
Petr, I will be very interested to hear how this project goes, including
which FPGA you end up targeting, your application (large-scale
parallel? low power?), and how speed compares to the JIT'd VM running
on CPUs.
If you can use an open source toolchain, all the better, although a
free-as-i
I think this is the best source:
http://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/racket-machine/
But this is helpful too
http://docs.racket-lang.org/raco/decompile.html
I would target a subset like what Whalesong does first
http://hashcollision.org/whalesong/
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Petr Samarin w
Hi all,
I am planning to write a hardware implementation of the Racket VM.
Basically something like JOP (http://www.jopdesign.com/) but for Racket.
Where can I find the documentation for the Racket VM?
Thanks,
Peter
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Yes.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Mathew Kurian wrote:
> on command prompt?
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Robby Findler <
> ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>
>> Well, I'll cheat: you say "raco make filename.rkt".
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Mathew Kurian
on command prompt?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Well, I'll cheat: you say "raco make filename.rkt".
>
> Robby
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Mathew Kurian
> wrote:
>
>> Hahahaha...Neil, i agree with you, it will be my one of my best of
>> friends [?]
>>
>> But,
Well, I'll cheat: you say "raco make filename.rkt".
Robby
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Mathew Kurian wrote:
> Hahahaha...Neil, i agree with you, it will be my one of my best of friends
> [?]
>
> But, give me some time to read through...it may take a while before i have
> a question.
>
> Tha
Hahahaha...Neil, i agree with you, it will be my one of my best of friends
[?]
But, give me some time to read through...it may take a while before i have a
question.
Thanks again Deren and Neil...i really appreciate your help.
Sincerely,
Mathew Kurian
--
Mathew Kurian
Seven Lakes High School
Mathew Kurian wrote at 09/19/2010 01:25 AM:
For java, you just put in javac filename.java, etc. Is there
something like that I can implement for Racket?
If you want to compile Racket code from the OS command prompt, I think
you want this manual:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/raco/
Better y
That is a good idea good Deren. Ill read up on that a bit.
Meanwhile a quick question, can it be called via command prompt?
--
Mathew Kurian
Seven Lakes High School
*“Do all the good you can, b**y all the means you can,*
*In all the ways you can, in all the places you can,
At all the times you ca
Hey everybody,
I am trying to figure out a way to compile Racket code through command
prompt for instance.
For java, you just put in javac filename.java, etc. Is there something like
that I can implement for Racket?
Thank you for your help guys.
And remember to have a great day!
Sincerely,
M
21 matches
Mail list logo
