> ./racket: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found
> (required by ./racket)
I just ran into this problem and a search led me to this thread, thanks.
I am running Debian 7.8 wheezy which includes glibc 2.13. I originally
used the Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise) 64bit installer fro
The new download pages include a 64-bit Debian Squeeze installer for v6.0.
At Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:10:50 +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> John Clements asked about a Debian version the other day. Robby Findler
> pointed him to: http://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/snapshots/
>
> I suggest downloading the
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> As an aside: I do not understand the comment that VIM must be
> installed from sources, either. A Google search for the term "vim
> windows" comes with the first hit to the official VIM web site's link
> to a pre-packaged, self-installing exec
>
> racket/bin/racket: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required
> by racket/bin/racket)
Note: this error has been seen in other contexts. A Google search for
this term comes up with several hits:
https://www.google.com/#q=%2Flib64%2Flibc.so.6%3A+version+%60GLIBC_2.14'+n
Hi Junia
> I am a professor of Computer Science in a technological institute. My
research is comparing productivity of computer
> languages using Measurement Theory.
As a software professional and one-time researcher your research
sounds intriguing. Software productivity is one of those areas tha
John Clements asked about a Debian version the other day. Robby Findler
pointed him to: http://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/snapshots/
I suggest downloading the Debian Wheezy version which I guess would
have the glibc version you need.
--
Manfred
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:03:26 -0300
Junia Magellan
Excellent post! I fully agree.
--
Manfred
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:30:01 +
Matthew Eric Bassett wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 09:03 PM, Junia Magellan wrote:
> > I would like you to understand that most people are not PhD in
> > Computer Science. 90% of people want to run out of the box
> > applica
Hi Junia.
I am an OpenIndiana User, Racket is the most easiest (big) language to
build in Solaris and its forks, and it works no difference from it in other
operating systems.
In OpenIndiana even guile I cannot build without pain.
I was a vim+mzscheme user, I built it in MacOSX in which platform v
Junia, which GNU/Linux distribution and version are you using? Some
version of Conectiva?
Distributing compiled software for all the GNU/Linux distributions is
more complicated than it is for a few versions of Windows and Mac OS X.
Often, people using some GNU/Linux distribution have good lu
On 03/05/2014 09:03 PM, Junia Magellan wrote:
I would like you to understand that most people are not PhD in
Computer Science. 90% of people want to run out of the box
applications. Even programmers don't have in depth knowledge about the
workings of computers and operating systems. I don't know
Could I chime in and suggest building with something like Debian stable
which has older, but not too old, libraries? Things built on Debian stable
should work on newer Linuxes.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Junia Magellan wrote:
>
> I w
On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Junia Magellan wrote:
> I would like you to understand that most people are not PhD in Computer
> Science. 90% of people want to run out of the box applications. Even
> programmers don't have in depth knowledge about the workings of computers and
> operating systems
Thanks for the report. We have completely revised our process for
building and distributing Racket in version 6.0, and it appears that
one of the hiccups in the new process may be that the Linux build ends
up depending on a newer version of libc. I'm investigating.
While I appreciate the problem r
I am a professor of Computer Science in a technological institute. My
research is comparing productivity of computer languages using Measurement
Theory. I think you already know that from my previous posts. The point is
that Racket 6.0 installer is very unfriendly. Well, it is almost like the
insta
14 matches
Mail list logo
