Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-19 Thread Jussi Salmela
Using version 5.3.0.16--2012-07-19 on Windows 7 the exe creation produces a functioning exe. The exe size is 8 888 KB so that's about the same as it was produced on earlier versions Thanks, Jussi On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I've pushed a repair for the executable-c

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-16 Thread Matthew Flatt
I've pushed a repair for the executable-creation bug. At Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:03:17 +0300, Jussi Salmela wrote: > An interesting (?) fact is the size difference between the last one and the > other resulting exes: > 5.1 8 978 KB > 5.2 8 239 KB > 5.2.1 8 748 KB >

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-16 Thread Jussi Salmela
> It's the current git head (as of last Th) according to my DrRacket. I assume > you're using git head because that's where 5.3.0.13 seems to come from. -- > Matthias Im downloading the bin from http://pre.racket-lang.org/installers/ and it has: version 5.3.0.13, updated at Friday, July 06 2012

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-16 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Jul 16, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Jussi Salmela wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen > wrote: >> >> Would you mind trying out 5.3.0.14? It is possible that a shift of a require >> from one place to another has cut back the size, but it is just a conjecture. >> >> [I scribbl

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-16 Thread Jussi Salmela
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Would you mind trying out 5.3.0.14? It is possible that a shift of a require > from one place to another has cut back the size, but it is just a conjecture. > > [I scribbled the docs for the primitives and I added interactive examples

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-16 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:03 AM, Jussi Salmela wrote: > 5.3.0.13 11 716 KB > > So the last build process pulls in roughly 3 MB more stuff than the others. > This may be caused by some changes that have been done to Racket but > then again it might have something to do with the error situation.

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-15 Thread Jussi Salmela
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > As a clarification question: have executables created with old versions > stopped working, or is it only executables created with the pre-release > version that fail to work? > > Robby The exe versions built with Racket versions 5.1, 5.2 and

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-15 Thread Robby Findler
As a clarification question: have executables created with old versions stopped working, or is it only executables created with the pre-release version that fail to work? Robby On Sunday, July 15, 2012, Jussi Salmela wrote: > Versions: Win 7 & Racket 5.3.0.13--2012-07-05(467bde3/a) > > I have a

Re: [racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-15 Thread Robby Findler
Thanks. I believe this is the same as the test suite failure we're seeing in DrDr: http://drdr.racket-lang.org/24901/collects/tests/drracket/teaching-lang-executable-creation.rkt so we're aware of the problem and hope to have fix before the next release. Robby On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:19 PM, J

[racket] Program works OK in DrRacket, not as an executable

2012-07-15 Thread Jussi Salmela
Versions: Win 7 & Racket 5.3.0.13--2012-07-05(467bde3/a) I have a program starting like this: #lang racket/gui (require 2htdp/batch-io) (require racket/mpair) (require srfi/13) ;;; Jussi Salmela, http://www.saunalahti.fi/jussalme ;;; ;;; This program produces graphs for blood pressure monitor (