Re: [racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-18 Thread Danny Yoo
>> Many thanks for your interest. I have used the version just uploaded to >> PLaneT >> and it works. For a Racket ignoramus like me this is a buzz! Many thanks to >> all. Ok, I just added docs to it. :) Here: http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/dyoo/porter-stemmer.plt/1/2/planet-docs/

Re: [racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-08 Thread Danny Yoo
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:59 PM, John Sampson wrote: > Hello - > > Many thanks for your interest. I have used the version just uploaded to > PLaneT > and it works. For a Racket ignoramus like me this is a buzz! Many thanks to > all. No problem! Currently, I've got no time to write the proper doc

[racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-08 Thread John Sampson
Hello - Many thanks for your interest. I have used the version just uploaded to PLaneT and it works. For a Racket ignoramus like me this is a buzz! Many thanks to all. Regards _John Sampson_ On 08/02/2012 18:22, Phil Bewig wrote: If you're looking at the suggested solution, the easiest way

Re: [racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-08 Thread Phil Bewig
If you're looking at the suggested solution, the easiest way to get the code is to follow the links to the codepad page and copy the code from there. If you're looking at the program in the comments, you may want to view source and scroll down to the program. You'll have to delete the html tags an

Re: [racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-08 Thread Danny Yoo
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:42 AM, John Sampson wrote: > Hello - > > see http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/09/08/porter-stemming/ Awesome. Ok, I've taken the code there and put it up as a Racket PLaneT package to make it easier to use. For example: ;;

Re: [racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-08 Thread John Clements
On Feb 4, 2012, at 1:38 PM, John Sampson wrote: > Hello - > > I have found code for a Scheme version of the Porter stemming algorithm. > > Supposedly it has been tested on PLT Scheme but when loaded into > DrRacket there are many unreadable characters and syntax errors. > > Is there an impleme

Re: [racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-05 Thread Phil Bewig
There are two stemmers on that page. I wrote the reference solution, but not the solution given in the comments. If it is the reference solution that is causing trouble, I am happy to help. Please tell me exactly what is going wrong. On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:42 AM, John Sampson wrote: > Hello -

[racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-05 Thread John Sampson
Hello - see http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/09/08/porter-stemming/ Regards _John Sampson_ On 04/02/2012 21:59, Danny Yoo wrote: Where's the source? On Feb 4, 2012 4:40 PM, "John Sampson" > wrote: Hello - I have found code for a Scheme version of the

Re: [racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-04 Thread Danny Yoo
Where's the source? On Feb 4, 2012 4:40 PM, "John Sampson" wrote: > Hello - > > I have found code for a Scheme version of the Porter stemming algorithm. > > Supposedly it has been tested on PLT Scheme but when loaded into > DrRacket there are many unreadable characters and syntax errors. > > Is t

[racket] Porter stemming algorithm

2012-02-04 Thread John Sampson
Hello - I have found code for a Scheme version of the Porter stemming algorithm. Supposedly it has been tested on PLT Scheme but when loaded into DrRacket there are many unreadable characters and syntax errors. Is there an implemention of the stemmer that really works with Racket? The Porter h