Sorry -- typo in my code, my last email should read:
OK using define-local-member-name works, see case 1 below, but it
seems it would be much simpler if there was a form define/inheritable
which made the method accessable within the class body where it was
defined and in the sub-class bodies on
OK using define-local-member-name works, see case 1 below, but it
seems it would be much simpler if there was a form define/inheritable
which made the method accessable within the class body where it was
defined and in the sub-class bodies only. (see case 2 below)
i.e. no wrapping in a let that ret
On 2013-01-03 17:01:54 -0500, Harry Spier wrote:
> In Racket is it possible to override a non-public method?
>
> [...]
>
> Apologies if I've missed something obvious but I've just started going
> through the Classes and Objects documentation. I can see where you
> can declare a method public and o
Dear list members,
In Racket is it possible to override a non-public method?
For example in the Racket Guide section 13 and 13.1 it gives this example:
(class object%
(init size); initialization argument
(define current-size size) ; field
(super-new); supe
4 matches
Mail list logo
