d...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
> Sent: 05 April 2011 17:21
> To: Jos Koot
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules
>
> FWIW, you also have to make sure that any module that requires your
> test module does not also require one of the su
l.com
>> [mailto:robby.find...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
>> Sent: 05 April 2011 16:57
>> To: Jos Koot
>> Cc: users
>> Subject: Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules
>>
>> I don't think that there is any particular reason for that s
@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
> Sent: 05 April 2011 16:57
> To: Jos Koot
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: [racket] Order of executing required modules
>
> I don't think that there is any particular reason for that specific
> order, but there is a reason not to rely on an
I don't think that there is any particular reason for that specific
order, but there is a reason not to rely on any order. Specifically,
if you ever get one of those other files requiring each other, then
this will disrupt the order you see. For example, if both test-a.rkt
and test-z.rkt require te
Hi
Consider:
File all-tetst.rkt
#lang scheme
(require "test-a.rkt")
(require "test-b.rkt")
(require "test-c.rkt")
(require "test-d.rkt")
...
(require "test-z.rkt")
It appears that the tests are done in reverse order, id est from z to a in
stead from a to z. Not really a problem for me, but i
5 matches
Mail list logo
