t: 05 April 2011 11:10
To: users
Subject: Re: [racket] Newbie question: Teach Yourself Scheme in Fixnum Days-
macros
In case any lurkers like me are interested.
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2011/04/writing-syntax-case-macros.html
Stephen
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
O
In case any lurkers like me are interested.
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2011/04/writing-syntax-case-macros.html
Stephen
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Four hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like a
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Four hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>>
>> It looks like a great macro essay for a certain crowd (altho the
>> essay seems to insult that selfsame crowd; perhaps you are assuming
>> that that crowd is into S&M?).
>
> Where's the insult? (I did
Four hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> It looks like a great macro essay for a certain crowd (altho the
> essay seems to insult that selfsame crowd; perhaps you are assuming
> that that crowd is into S&M?).
Where's the insult? (I didn't mean any insult -- the only thing I can
think of is the "
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 6 hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>> Eli wrote an excellent introduction to Racket macros on
>> comp.lang.scheme recently, which I've encouraged him to post on the
>> Racket blog.
>
> I'm not sure how "excellent" it is, but I posted it
6 hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> Eli wrote an excellent introduction to Racket macros on
> comp.lang.scheme recently, which I've encouraged him to post on the
> Racket blog.
I'm not sure how "excellent" it is, but I posted it now. Please let
me know if you see any obvious problems.
(
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 5:45 AM, Archie Maskill wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:29 AM, John Sampson wrote:
>>
>> Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the whole, I
>> have found Teach Yourself Scheme
>> relatively
On Apr 4, 2011, at 5:45 AM, Archie Maskill wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:29 AM, John Sampson wrote:
> Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the whole, I have
> found Teach Yourself Scheme
> relatively easy to follow.
>
> Regards
>
> _John Sampson_
>
> I was learnin
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:29 AM, John Sampson wrote:
> Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the whole, I
> have found Teach Yourself Scheme
> relatively easy to follow.
>
> Regards
>
> _John Sampson_
I was learning how to use scheme macros recently, and I found this docum
Yes, go ahead!
regards,
--dorai
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Prabhakar Ragde wrote:
>
> > Matthias wrote:
> >
> Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the
> whole, I have found Teach Yourself Scheme re
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:20:30 -0400, Prabhakar Ragde wrote:
>> This comment is about more than macros: Since students are often drawn
>> to TYS even though I never mention it to them, I've always been tempted
>> to "translate" TYS into what i
At Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:20:30 -0400, Prabhakar Ragde wrote:
> This comment is about more than macros: Since students are often drawn
> to TYS even though I never mention it to them, I've always been tempted
> to "translate" TYS into what is now Racket, not just literally but with
> some of the Ht
On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Prabhakar Ragde wrote:
> Matthias wrote:
>
Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the
whole, I have found Teach Yourself Scheme relatively easy to
follow.
>> Yes, but when it comes to macros, it espouses a view that was never
>> co
Matthias wrote:
Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the
whole, I have found Teach Yourself Scheme relatively easy to
follow.
Yes, but when it comes to macros, it espouses a view that was never
compatible with any Report on Scheme and is even old-school for plain
Lisp. If
On Mar 30, 2011, at 6:29 AM, John Sampson wrote:
> Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the whole, I have
> found Teach Yourself Scheme
> relatively easy to follow.
Yes, but when it comes to macros, it espouses a view that was never compatible
with any Report on Scheme an
2011/3/30 John Sampson :
> Hello -
>
> I am going through TYSIFD which is said to be compatible with mzScheme.
>
> Descriptions of macros seem to be different depending which book one reads.
> TYSIFD advises the reader to 'require' the defmacro library
> - '(require (lib "defmacro.rkt"))' when usin
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:31, John Sampson wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I am going through TYSIFD which is said to be compatible with mzScheme.
>
> Descriptions of macros seem to be different depending which book one reads.
> TYSIFD advises the reader to 'require' the defmacro library
> - '(require (li
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:29, John Sampson wrote:
> Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the whole, I have
> found Teach Yourself Scheme
> relatively easy to follow.
I read TYSIFD many years ago and I don't remember exactly what it says
about macros.
>From your first post
Do you think these give a better explanation of macros? On the whole, I
have found Teach Yourself Scheme
relatively easy to follow.
Regards
_John Sampson_
On 30/03/2011 10:44, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:31, John Sampson wrote:
What is the best source for learning
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:31, John Sampson wrote:
> What is the best source for learning about macros in Racket, assuming no
> previous
> knowledge of macros?
Have you already tried the Getting Started docs in the Help Desk?
_
For list-related a
Hello -
I am going through TYSIFD which is said to be compatible with mzScheme.
Descriptions of macros seem to be different depending which book one reads.
TYSIFD advises the reader to 'require' the defmacro library
- '(require (lib "defmacro.rkt"))' when using Racket (I assume) - and
gives the
21 matches
Mail list logo
