Re: [racket] Nesting evt handlers

The intent of `handle-evt' is that the handling procedure is called in tail position with respect to `sync'. That tail guarantee is not consistent with nesting. We could tail that the handler is called in tail position only if it's not nested, but we normally use `handle-evt' in cases where tail b

Re: [racket] Nesting evt handlers

Thanks, that's clear now. Another question regarding events: Why is it forbidden to put a handle-evt inside another handle- or wrap-evt? I couldn't come up with a situation where this could cause trouble. Especially as it is allowed to nest handle-evts if i put a guard-evt or a struct with