Thanks to this Eli, I now see what parameters are.
By chance I also just came across your's, Ryan's and Matthew's article
"Keeping It Clean with Syntax Parameters"
http://www.schemeworkshop.org/2011/papers/Barzilay2011.pdf
that makes crystal clear all the issues about the question I asked.
Cheers
On Wednesday, Harry Spier wrote:
> [...]
> but I've been unable to create a macro to create this form:
> ---
> (with-sequence SOME-SEQUENCE
> . . . .. . (get-next) .
> . . . (get-next) . . . etc.)
> ---
>
> where I don't pas
Thanks William. Its not a for loop that I'm looking for, but rather a scope
within which I have access to the sequence. A typical case will be where I
have two procedures within the scope that are recursive but also pass control
to each other under certain conditions, and each of these procedu
On Wed, 5/16/12, Harry Spier wrote:
> I'm trying to create a macro to
> simplify the syntax of having a local
> scope with an indexed sequence generator.
>
> Instead of entering this:
> (let-values ([(more? get next) (sequence-generate
> (in-indexed SOME-SEQUENCE)])
> (get-next)
> ...
I'm trying to create a macro to simplify the syntax of having a local
scope with an indexed sequence generator.
Instead of entering this:
(let-values ([(more? get next) (sequence-generate (in-indexed SOME-SEQUENCE)])
(get-next) ...(get-next).. etc. ))
I'd like to be able to enter this
5 matches
Mail list logo
