At Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:51:55 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> The script (as it is) has STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S" on the
> "make install" command line. I also run configure with:
>
> ./configure --disable-docs --host=$HOST \
>STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S"
>
> But that ${CROSS_C
At Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:51:55 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> The script (as it is) has STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S" on the
> "make install" command line. I also run configure with:
>
> ./configure --disable-docs --host=$HOST \
>STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S"
>
> But that ${CROSS_C
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
>>
>> We're currently working on a new package system that will let us better
>> organize the core and make more useful layers --- but that's very much
>> a work in progress.
>
>
> Can I put in a vote for an "academic" layer and an "enterprise" lay
On 17/04/13 22:49, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:06:51 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
Does `strip -S' reduce the size of `racket'? I don't have a PPC machine
handy, but I get a 7686107-byte executable for ARM, which turns into
2845517 bytes after `strip -S'.
Smashing! 2,774,370 bytes!
At Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:06:51 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> I've just uploaded an (AFICT) working script to build racket on for
> PowerPC. [...]
>
> > # ls -l /mnt/nfs2/racket-5.3.3/bin
> -rwxrwxr-x1 1107 500616 Mar 8 11:52 mzc
> -rwxrwxr-x1 1107 500624 Mar 8 1
Folks,
I've just uploaded an (AFICT) working script to build racket on for
PowerPC.
https://github.com/tim-brown/racket-powerpc-cross
I have racket running on a small embedded P1021 device. From a 300MB NFS
installation! It runs small scripts, and has proven a neat little (ahem!)
tool.
I have
6 matches
Mail list logo