On Jun 12, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Hillary Ryan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Disclaimer: I am new to Racket, so please forgive the ignorance.
>
> Questions:
> 1) As a functional language, when Racket implemented classes did it do so
> with a different perspective or design philosophy than procedural langu
Hello,
Disclaimer: I am new to Racket, so please forgive the ignorance.
Questions:
1) As a functional language, when Racket implemented classes did it do so
with a different perspective or design philosophy than procedural languages
that made a similar transition? In other words, what is the cor
2 matches
Mail list logo
