J Arcane wrote on 11/18/2014 05:58 AM:
If Heresy becomes a proper teaching tool
I thought Socratic method was a teaching tool, Heresy was a political
misstep, and Hemlock was the result.
Neil V.
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
=
> Byron Davies, Ph.D. — 480-276-4285
> Chief Learner and Director of K-12 Innovation
> bdav...@starshineacademy.org
> http://StarShineAcademy.org
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2014, at 10:00 AM, users-requ...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:20:0
; bdav...@starshineacademy.org
> http://StarShineAcademy.org
>
>
>> On Nov 16, 2014, at 10:00 AM, users-requ...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:20:00 +0100
>> From: Konrad Hinsen
>> To: J Arcane
>> Cc: Rac
equ...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:20:00 +0100
> From: Konrad Hinsen <mailto:konrad.hin...@fastmail.net>>
> To: J Arcane mailto:jarc...@gmail.com>>
> Cc: Racket Users mailto:users@racket-lang.org>>
> Subject: [racket] Can&#x
With help from soegaard in the channel, we got it working; turns out the
issue was failing to declare syntax literals externally from the macros
they're used in. Works great within a module, but Racket gets cranky if
they aren't explicitly named and exported.
It's working now, you can find it on G
J Arcane writes:
> I've been tinkering about with a BASIC-inspired Lisp syntax in Racket to
> practice
> macros. I've now got all the basic definitions established and wanted to
> thus start
> working on making it usable as a language, at least with #lang s-expr but
> I'm failing
> even
Greetings,
I've been tinkering about with a BASIC-inspired Lisp syntax in Racket to
practice macros. I've now got all the basic definitions established and
wanted to thus start working on making it usable as a language, at least
with #lang s-expr but I'm failing even at that. I can't even get my f
7 matches
Mail list logo
