Re: [racket] [racket-dev] `string-split'

2012-05-25 Thread Pierpaolo Bernardi
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:55 PM, namekuseijin wrote: > while we're at it, why do you guys make the order or arguments like that? > > like, these are easier to read than in the order available in racket: > > (string-split "," "6,5,1,12,13,8,15,9,3,7,4,2,14,10,11") > (sort < '(6 5 1 12 13 8 15 9 3

Re: [racket] [racket-dev] `string-split'

2012-05-24 Thread Eli Barzilay
About a month ago, namekuseijin wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: namekuseijin > Date: Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:54 PM > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] `string-split' > To: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > wrote: > > Note that (st

[racket] [racket-dev] `string-split'

2012-04-19 Thread namekuseijin
-- Forwarded message -- From: namekuseijin Date: Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:54 PM Subject: Re: [racket-dev] `string-split' To: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Note that (string-split str ";") works given that implementation, while