Hi,
After an in-place build of Racket from source (from a git clone), what's
the correct way to test that Racket functions correctly? I can't find
documentation on this. Is it simply running "racket/bin/raco test
pkgs/racket-test" from the root of the repository? Also, for a release
(say, tag
nder/expand/main.rkt") appear to be
non-essential, but may offer minor performance advantages (really not sure).
On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 2:15:32 AM UTC-4, Yongming Shen wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks for the explanations. But I'm still not convinced that the
> top-
er to
itself, simply because of how macro expansion works, so the
top-level-bind-scope is again not needed for recursion. Is my understanding
correct?
On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 10:05:12 AM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Mon, 23 Mar 2020 01:45:40 -0700 (PDT), Yongming Shen wrote:
ote:
> >
> > >On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:46:53PM -0400, George Neuner wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 01:45:40 -0700 (PDT), Yongming Shen
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >I have the following as `module-that-defines-fib`:
> > >
ming
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 at 9:25:01 AM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:00:07 -0700 (PDT), Yongming Shen wrote:
> > First, in the source file expander/expand/bind-top.rkt, there is a
> comment
> > that says "When compiling `(define-values (x
Hi,
I noticed that top level (define-values ...) forms create bindings that
include the top-level-bind-scope (of the namespace's root-expand-context),
and have two questions related to this.
First, in the source file expander/expand/bind-top.rkt, there is a comment
that says "When compiling `(
amespace directly except in
> limited cases.
>
> At Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:09:44 -0800 (PST), Yongming Shen wrote:
> > Hi, I have encountered a counterintuitive behavior of namespace-require
> and
> > wonder if it is a bug.
> > Basically, namespace-require behaves d
Hi, I have encountered a counterintuitive behavior of namespace-require and
wonder if it is a bug.
Basically, namespace-require behaves differently when the target namespace
is passed by parameterizing current-namespace, compared to when the
optional namespace parameter is used.
For example, th
Got my answer from another
discussion:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/qW-NZN2pwgk/y309YUwqEwAJ
On Saturday, July 27, 2019 at 12:56:33 AM UTC-4, Yongming Shen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that after an identifier has been shifted
> by syntax-shift-phase-leve
cope (i.e., not establish a binding for some
> arbitrary other context). The affect on the `let` binding here seems
> like an unfortunate side effect of the way that constraint is
> implemented.
>
> At Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Yongming Shen wrote:
> > I think I fo
UTC-4, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 01:49:23AM -0700, Yongming Shen wrote:
> > On the topic of making Racket 2 more appealing to new users. As a new
> user
> > myself, I have one (likely uninformed) suggestion:
> >
> > Design and promote a &q
On the topic of making Racket 2 more appealing to new users. As a new user
myself, I have one (likely uninformed) suggestion:
Design and promote a "boring core subset" that an experienced programmer
can pick up easily and be as productive as when using an "ordinary
programming language", withou
how (let ...) handles identifiers with shifted phase levels?
Thanks,
Yongming
On Friday, July 26, 2019 at 7:07:49 AM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Thu, 25 Jul 2019 18:55:18 -0700 (PDT), Yongming Shen wrote:
> > Based on my understanding, (bound-identifier=? id-a id-b) onl
Hi,
It seems that after an identifier has been shifted
by syntax-shift-phase-level, the original identifier can bind the shifted
identifier, but not the other way around. I think the correct behavior is
that neither should bind the other. The following code can be used to test
this.
(define-s
Hi there,
Based on my understanding, (bound-identifier=? id-a id-b) only returns true
if id-a would bind id-b AND id-b would bind id-a. Also based on my
understanding, id-a will bind id-b doesn't imply that id-b will bind id-a.
So, if I only want to check whether id-a will bind id-b, which func
15 matches
Mail list logo
