Re: [racket-users] Racket backwards compatible to schemer books?

* Tim Johnson [161122 03:41]: > Hello racketeers : > > I retired as a coder. Now I can write in whatever programming > language I wish to. > > I'd like to learn racket. I intend to start by working off of the > Schemer books. I have the first three. > > Is rac

Re: [racket-users] Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

* Tim Johnson [161118 13:02]: > I am sending this from my browser, pointed at > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!newtopic/racket-users as a test. > > Although I have been receiving emails sent to the Racket Users email list > (racket-users@googlegroups.com) as a subscriber, em

[racket-users] Racket backwards compatible to schemer books?

Hello racketeers : I retired as a coder. Now I can write in whatever programming language I wish to. I'd like to learn racket. I intend to start by working off of the Schemer books. I have the first three. Is racket fully compatible to the code in the schemer books? If not, is there a site that

[racket-users] Re: Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 5:27:37 PM UTC-9, gneuner2 wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:20:24 -0500, George Neuner > wrote: > > >You can send directly to racket-users@googlegroups.com > > > Ok, that was interesting. I wrote: > >racket-users at googlegroups dot com > > and it appears t

[racket-users] Re: Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:02:20 PM UTC-9, Tim Johnson wrote: > I am sending this from my browser, pointed at > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!newtopic/racket-users as a test. > > Although I have been receiving emails sent to the Racket Users email list >

[racket-users] Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

I am sending this from my browser, pointed at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!newtopic/racket-users as a test. Although I have been receiving emails sent to the Racket Users email list (racket-users@googlegroups.com) as a subscriber, emails sent by me to the same list via my desktop email cli

Re: [racket] Off-topic: Scheme for JVM?

* Karl Winterling [100611 11:21]: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Tim Johnson wrote: > > >  Very interesting! Could you elaborate on this Google > >  investment in kawa? Or just post some links? > >  thanks > > I think that Google uses Scheme as a configuratio

Re: [racket] Off-topic: Scheme for JVM?

* Shriram Krishnamurthi [100609 10:27]: <...> Since Google has some investment in Kawa, I'm > sure it's in good shape. Very interesting! Could you elaborate on this Google investment in kawa? Or just post some links? thanks -- Tim tim at johnsons-web.com or akwebsoft.com http://www.akwe