Re: [racket-users] Racket v7.3

I am also keen to know the IO perf optimization results in real world. Dexter, if possible can you give us some approximate throughput or latency numbers when you switch to v7.3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe f

Re: [racket-users] Racket 7 multi core support

Thanks Sam. When you say Racket 7's "cs" variant can use Future and Places to leverage multiple CPU cores, is it one OS process or multiple ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em

Re: [racket-users] Racket 7 multi core support

> > what if i dont wish to juggle between Threads and Places to leverage all > CPU cores ? Just use Thread abstraction. Chez Scheme page says it can possible run on multi core, so I believe it must be possible for Racket 7 to do so ??? https://github.com/cisco/chezscheme -- You received th

[racket-users] Racket 7 multi core support

Will Racket 7 support utilizing multi-core CPUs in one process instance ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket Web servlet performance benchmarked and compared

Wow. ~7K looks like good number. Is it common practice to spawn Thread for each request ? Is it that cheap from resource point of view ? can ThreadPool could be of some help here ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscrib

[racket-users] unit of current-thread-initial-stack-size value

What is the unit of current-thread-initial-stack-size value ? Is it in KB ? what is recommended minimum value ? I did not find any page on Racket official doc to get this info so asking here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket Web servlet performance benchmarked and compared

Thanks for the clarification. On 03-Sep-2017 12:31 AM, "George Neuner" wrote: > > On 9/2/2017 1:46 PM, Piyush Katariya wrote: > >> Does Racket app make use of all CPU cores by having multiple processes ? >> > > If it is written to use "places",

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket Web servlet performance benchmarked and compared

Then it might not be a fair benchmark with a comparison to other Platforms. Isnt it ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@

[racket-users] Re: Racket Web servlet performance benchmarked and compared

Just curious ... Does Racket app make use of all CPU cores by having multiple processes ? In go app, there isnt any need to becoz golang runtime uses all CPU avialble by default. So is the case with JVM and Erlang VM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[racket-users] Re: [racket] thread size and creation time

I am wondering if this still the case with Racket 6.10 ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more opti

[racket-users] Re: Racket v6.6

"Typed Racket produces up to 4x smaller compiled files" This is killer enhancement ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@g

[racket-users] Re: HTTP Server and CPU usage

Thanks for reply Jay. So its sound like node.js without callbacks, thats pretty sweet ! I am wondering how efficient it is compared to libuv ? Thanks, Piyush Katariya -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe

[racket-users] Re: HTTP Server and CPU usage

BTW if it has Single system thread does it block IO calls by default ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

[racket-users] Re: HTTP Server and CPU usage

State will be in database. So Racket server will be stateless. Is there any library to support and manage different process in bakground. Just like we have "cluster" module in node.js -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscri

[racket-users] HTTP Server and CPU usage

Does HTTP server makes use of all CPU cores of machine ? if not, how to achieve it ? Thanks, Piyush -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-

[racket-users] Typed Racket

Hi, I am new to Racket lang. I have an experience coding in Clojure. I have q query about Typed Racket. Is it viable to use typed racket for production use ? is it entirely different language ? how much extra speed/performance we achieve compare to plain racket ? Does it support all open source