Re: [racket-users] [baseball-cap with `standard-fish`]

2021-12-21 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
The no context email left me trying to decrypt the hidden meaning 😂 . Thought I was being phished for a second. Here is from discourse: “”“ spdegabrielle: [baseball-cap by Justin Zamora] Made with Racket by @JustinZed “”” >  > > > Image credit at > https://racket.discourse.group/t/baseball

[racket-users] Anyone successfully filtering Italian spam?

2021-11-29 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
It’s getting through my filters, neither rspamd or my local client can catch on to it. Is there a good simple filter? Nate -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [racket-users] Manually create cpointer value in racket?

2020-10-07 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
t; > casts it to a C pointer. > > Matthew > > At Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:28:42 -0500, Nathaniel Griswold wrote: >> Related to a question I asked earlier, but this time at the racket side: >> >> Is there any way to manually construct a cpointer with a raw pointer value? &g

[racket-users] Re: Manually create cpointer value in racket?

2020-10-07 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
And by “remote process” I just mean a separate process, the parent is sending it to the child. > On Oct 7, 2020, at 10:28 AM, Nathaniel Griswold > wrote: > > Related to a question I asked earlier, but this time at the racket side: > > Is there any way to manually construct

[racket-users] Manually create cpointer value in racket?

2020-10-07 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
Related to a question I asked earlier, but this time at the racket side: Is there any way to manually construct a cpointer with a raw pointer value? I suppose this would mean being able to construct a chez record in racket. My use case is that I have a remote process talking to a racket process,

Re: [racket-users] question about places and main thread gc

2020-10-01 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
ame as creating an > OS thread manually and activating it --- but see the caveats in the > documentation for `call-in-os-thread`. > > At Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:17:08 -0500, Nathaniel Griswold wrote: >> Cool. Thanks. I can play around with an activated thread to try and make the >

Re: [racket-users] question about places and main thread gc

2020-10-01 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
Cool. Thanks. I can play around with an activated thread to try and make the calls I want. I guess i wasn’t clear on the difference between an activated manually made thread and a place. Will manually made activated threads always share the same allocator in new versions of racket cs? Will I alw

Re: [racket-users] catalog not working?

2020-07-23 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
Oh, hm ok I was having a memory access crash in raco I assumed some causation.. I’ll debug tomorrow > On Jul 23, 2020, at 10:14 PM, Sorawee Porncharoenwase > wrote: > >  > Though, considering that there are so many people who are misled that the > catalog is down (my past self included), it

Re: [racket-users] Re: What’s everyone working on this week?

2019-12-13 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
Oh, interesting. Yes the tail call optimization for my interpreter was one thing I need to hand-code. It will be a good learning experience. > On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:05 AM, Anthony Carrico wrote: > > On 12/13/19 12:26 AM, Nathaniel Griswold wrote: >> Could I just write llvm dir

Re: [racket-users] Re: What’s everyone working on this week?

2019-12-12 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
s://github.com/rjnw/sham/tree/master/test > > Sam > >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:03 PM Nathaniel Griswold >> wrote: >> >> Racket to generate llvm >> >>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 12

Re: [racket-users] Re: What’s everyone working on this week?

2019-12-12 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
Racket to generate llvm > On Dec 12, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:49:01AM -0800, Nathaniel Griswold wrote: >> I am almost done with chapter 5 of SICP which i have been working on in >> racket. >> >> My plan now is to wr

[racket-users] Re: racket-mode in emacs and error navigation

2019-12-12 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
I have discovered that if i do a C-u C-c C-c i get better error messages and can navigate to the proper spot. It uses something called errortrace. So i guess this is a non-issue. On Thursday, December 12, 2019 at 12:53:55 PM UTC-6, Nathaniel Griswold wrote: > > Hello. I really like DrRa

[racket-users] racket-mode in emacs and error navigation

2019-12-12 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
Hello. I really like DrRacket's error output but i have recently switched to emacs as i prefer its parenthesis navigation modes and other things about it. One thing i noticed is when i have an error, say application with wrong number of args, if i navigate to error using "C-x `" i don't skip to

[racket-users] Re: What’s everyone working on this week?

2019-12-12 Thread Nathaniel Griswold
I am almost done with chapter 5 of SICP which i have been working on in racket. My plan now is to write a scheme compiler/interpreter with garbage collection that runs in native language in racket. I think i will use llvm. On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 2:13:49 AM UTC-6, Stephen De Gabrielle