This would be where I would reach for a let* to handle intermediate
results, because code like this is very awkward.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, John Carmack wrote:
> The idea that you functionally compose images like this:
>
> (place-image image-1 x y
> (place-image image-2 x y
>
FYI, I think the Mac version is out of date. Dropbox says the mac
installer file is two weeks old, and the windows version is a few
hours old.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:27 PM, John Carmack wrote:
> We “released” my 10 year old son’s game that was done in Racket:
> www.1k3c.com
>
>
>
> I’m stil
My impression is that stored procedures are much less commonly used
than sending plain strings across the wire to the DB. I don't have any
data for this though, just my impression.
The common way to avoid SQL injections is to use some symbol to
represent a variable to be replaced on the server wit
One example of eval being used for extremely practical purposes is with SQL.
Many practical programmers regularly generate SQL strings which are then
passed to a remote server, which are then evaluated. Indeed, all the same sorts
of arguments against eval may be made against SQL:
1. SQL is co
Crash bandicoot is the one example I know. Is that what you were thinking of?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 25, 2015, at 8:02 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:04:07AM +, John Carmack wrote:
>> Half-life was written in C on my Quake 1 codebase.
>
> Thank you for the co
I think he's asking, when would you *not* use racket for something?
What problems is it particularly suited towards, and what areas is it
weak in?
I'd also like to know how the list would answer this.
PS sorry for forgetting to cc the list on my last msg Matthais.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 AM
Am I correct in understanding that you are unfamiliar with rebasing? If so I
would gladly pair with you on it. I do it all the time at work.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 3, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help folks!
>
> I'll take a long hard look at rebasing before I d
This is an excellent idea. I have no idea if this is being worked on,
but I would love to help such an effort.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Greg Davidson wrote:
> Is there interest in creating a Gnu Emacs Lisp Racket Language, along with
> the underlying APIs (perhaps tied to DrRacket) suffic
acro, and it was pretty hard to get working, so I am pretty sure the
code is gross in some way.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Joel McCracken
wrote:
> I tried creating an `examples` macro like the existing `examples`
> macro, without success. I'll try again later, but for now thanks!
t sure if lp2 includes some facility to make @examples work
without the evaluator creation.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Joel McCracken
wrote:
> I'm glad there is a repository issue -- that's where I tried without
> success. I tried the build available right now (3bb896d) with
right.
>
> At Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:54:06 -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>> You probably want the current snapshot:
>>
>> http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Joel McCracken wrote:
>
Forwarding to users, since I forgot to reply-all.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joel McCracken
Date: Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [racket] using scribble/eval in conjunction with scribble/lp
To: Matthew Flatt
Hmm, I'm having trouble finding this new relea
(f x)
>(* x x))]
>
> -
>
> ;; lp-test.rkt
> #lang racket
> (require "lp.rkt")
> (f 3) ;; Error!
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Joel McCracken
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to create a document that in
I'm trying to create a document that includes code, describes that
code, includes example usage, and exports some of the bindings so that
it may be included later.
I've been looking at the scribble documentation, and it seems like all
this should be possible. I can't seem to figure out how to actu
Hi,
I have a I'm trying to figure out how to run specific test subsets. I
have organized different subsets into test suites, and do run-tests on
each of them, but I would prefer a scheme where:
1) I can run all of the tests for a project, and
2) I can "tag" tests to run subsets.
Is there a way t
15 matches
Mail list logo
