Galler schrieb:
'Racket could implement mutable continuations, but has not'
I was just thinking whether mutable continuations can
be used for some JIT-ing. Had already a question about
call-site code replacement here. And there some response
was to use set! on a symbol. But using set-car! looks
ne the-f f)
(define (g a)
(printf "(g ~a)\n" a)
(set! the-f f)
1)
(module+ main
(for ([i (in-range 10)])
(the-f i)))
OUTPUT:
(f 0)
(g 1)
(f 2)
(g 3)
(f 4)
(g 5)
(f 6)
(g 7)
(f 8)
(g 9)
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Jan Burse wrote:
Dear All,
I just wonder whether
Dear All,
I just wonder whether it is possible in a functional
language to do call site replacement. I envision this
as a special form of lazyness.
Basically I would call somewhere a function f
with an argument a:
... (f a) ...
The function would then manage to replace itself
by a function
3 matches
Mail list logo
