> (however, the flexibility of the win seems to fight with static typing,
> perhaps at a fundamental level, in my limited typed-racket experience so far
> -- a good topic for discussion?).
Details please? Yes, this is a wonderful topic for discussion.
> Most users of this particular system wil
> (however, the flexibility of the win seems to fight with static typing,
> perhaps at a fundamental level, in my limited typed-racket experience so far
> -- a good topic for discussion?).
Details please? Yes, this is a wonderful topic for discussion.
> Most users of this particular system wil
*Sigh*
While I'm happy to see John Carmack using a Lisp, you're missing the point. If
you offer Lisp as a "scripting language" you'll fail to show off why *exactly*
it's better. S-expressions shine because they save you from the entirely
mechanical task of parsing. There are emergent properties
3 matches
Mail list logo
