You may want to check out the documentation here:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/scripts.html?q=script
which discusses running Racket in scripts. Also, as suggested by other
people, you should try running this from the command line first.
Thanks,
-Everett
On 11/09/2010 10:09 AM, Sam Ph
I made the example from the free chapter (ch 8, the Hunt the Wumpus
game) work in Racket last week by writing macros and function
definitions to get the LISP code running under Racket with minimal
modifications. I haven't gotten to rewriting it in Universe yet, but I
did wonder if it would hav
On 10/20/2010 09:05 AM, Stephen Bloch wrote:
On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Nikita B. Zuev wrote:
I'm looking for a way to use Raket's structs in a functional way.
Example:
(define-struct person (name age))
...
(define (person-age-set p proc)
(make-person (person-name p)
(pr
Update to my previous post, I missed a ` character (just ran it to make
sure I was sane). The line is actually:
(list `#(,(regexp-replace* a-string (vector-ref (first T) 0)
(string-append "<<" a-string ">>")
Thanks,
-Everett
On 10/18/2010 03:23 PM, scouic wrote:
Hi all,
here more than
On 10/18/2010 03:23 PM, scouic wrote:
this is the function :
(define (rush! T super-list a-string)
(if (empty? T)
super-list ;; here is the problem
(rush! (rest T)
(append
super-list
(list (regexp-replace* a-string (vector-ref (
Does anyone know a good FFT implementation in Racket? Or bindings to something
like FFTW would work. All I've found in 30 min of Googling is toy examples of
1D FFT. The Larceny project's benchmark fft is also 1D and I haven't quite
figured out how to use it anyway. I will need both 1D and 2D.
Here's mine, probably not a very good way to implement this, but it
works and it uses the alt-exp syntax I've been playing with recently.
#lang alt-exp
#|
Spec: define a case construct syntactically just like that of Racket.
In terms of semantics:
- each branch automatically falls through to
7 matches
Mail list logo
