Re: [racket-users] C level bit manipulation - Racket Manifesto

2018-08-14 Thread David Brown
I think Racket handles this pretty well. The rule it defines is that a module cannot directly mutate another module's top-level symbols. This means that if a module itself does not contain any mutations of a top-level function, that definition cannot be changed at runtime. Therefore, everyone ca

Re: [racket] Racket & Netbook

2010-06-30 Thread David Brown
On Wednesday 30 June 2010, Neil Toronto said: > It'll drive any VGA projector or monitor under 2048x2048, and the newer > models probably do more and have digital output. It tends to take longer > than 3x to compile Slideshow apps compared to my desktop, but it's > snappy enough once that's don

Re: [racket] [The Racket Blog] New comment on Racket.

2010-06-18 Thread David Brown
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:50:53AM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: I'm not sure what Apple's userspace environment is like, since I can't see it, but at least for Android, there would probably be a good amount of work to port Racket to even a compiled app. The C library present is kind of hand craft

Re: [racket] [The Racket Blog] New comment on Racket.

2010-06-18 Thread David Brown
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:00:29PM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: On Jun 18, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: This means that if Racket gets an Arm port, it is possible to use it. MzScheme used to have an Arm port, but I am somewhat unsure, whether it has survived the test of time. Has it survived? Last

Re: [racket] iPhone

2010-06-18 Thread David Brown
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:32:19PM -0400, Jim Wise wrote: Remember, this isn't even a question of what you can run on your iPhone -- the (free!) iPhone developer kit lets you download software you compile yourself from your computer to the iPhone. What you can't do is upload that software to Ap