i apologize ,the confirmation mail was in the spam folder,
everything is fine now
thanks
Damien
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 6:46 PM John Clements
wrote:
> I’m sorry to hear that! Several things to check/try
>
> 1) I see the confirmation email coming from “rac...@discoursemail.com”,
> with subject l
Le Monday 27 November 2017 05:18:02 pm David Storrs, vous avez écrit :
>
> > 2. The macro stepper is extremely handy when it works, and being able to
> > inspect syntax objects in the interactions pane is wonderful when the
> > macro stepper doesn't work.
>
> Offtopic: This is the one big featu
i use emacs with all Scheme implementations and also for Racket,when debugging
i can use the racket editor that display information about trace calls
but i still modify in emacs and refresh only in DrRacket, in emacs i appeciate
the syntax highlighting and the search and replace fast short-cuts a
Le 31/07/2017 16:21, Greg Trzeciak a écrit :
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:48:07 PM UTC+2, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> As I heard it, the people who made Javascript originally wanted to use
>> Scheme, and were starting to set that up when management decided tht
>> it had to look like C. They ende
Le Saturday 10 June 2017 22:50:19 Jos Koot, vous avez écrit :
> To whom is interested.
>
> Jay McCarthy has a nice page about how to program Turing machines:
> http://jeapostrophe.github.io/2013-10-29-tmadd-post.html.
>
> Because I did not immediately see his implementation of producing a Turing
Le Friday 02 June 2017 23:32:58 'Ross Mckinlay' via Racket Users, vous avez
écrit :
> Hello Racketeers!
>
> I just released an early version of my first real Racket project, which
> extends Racket to become a 6502 assembler. Thought I would share it here:
>
> http://pinksquirrellabs.com/blog/2
Hi,
i have this macro which is not R5RS compliant and passes in Racket (6.1) with
#lang r5rs selected ?
the ellipsis is not the last argument has it must be in R5RS,
perheaps it has been corrected in newer version of Racket or there is another
explains?
regards,
damien
#lang r5rs
;;#lang rac
Hi,
why this does not work with DrRacket:
#lang racket
(define-syntax then
(syntax-rules ()
((_ ev) ev)
((_ ev ...) (begin ev ...
(define-syntax else
(syntax-rules ()
((_ ev) ev)
((_ ev ...) (begin ev ...
(if #f
(then
1
2
3)
(else
3
Hi,
just a few words to say my enhanced version of Logos (a Scheme program to
maipulate logical expressions symbolically) is on sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/logos1/
improvments are the Quine–McCluskey algorithm implementation and a Bigloo
version (needed adaptation mainly for h
t i)
> 0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The notes on chaperones & impersonators are only about efficiency. They
> shouldn't affect your choice.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Damien Mattei wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>
> what
hi,
what is the best way to clear a hash table, hash-clear or hash-clear! ? if the
hash-table is defined in a code at top-level and used in functions as a global
variable, the issue i have is that when at REPL i use a first time my function
(that use hash-table) it's ok but when i reuse the fun
Hi,
i have a code that works well in #lang racket and also with other scheme
compilers with minor changes,Bigloo,MIT scheme, but it does not work with #!r6rs
i do not know why,here it is (some extract):
#!r6rs
(import (rnrs))
...
;; sort operands in a logic expression
;; (sort-arguments-in-o
p every. In fact, if was published in the Byte magazine a long time
> ago. Here is the address:
>
> https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1979-08-rescan
>
> However, I like to program this stuff directly from the recipe from Prolog
> books.
>
>
> 2014-05-23 5:15
hello,
i was searching for some code for manipulating boolean formula, for example i
need to put an arbitrary boolean formula in DNF (Disjunctive Normal Form)
and i did not find anything in Scheme or Lisp, does anyone know if something
exist to do that?
regards,
Damien
--
e-mail: damien.mat..
14 matches
Mail list logo
