ation instructions. The gem is hosted at rubygems.org:
https://rubygems.org/gems/guard-rackunit.
If anyone needs assistance in using it, please feel free to reach out
to me directly. Here's hoping that someone finds this useful too.
--
Chad Albers
Racket Users li
I working on a small test program using Jay McCarthy's zmq FFI bindings.
I'm getting a segfault with this message:
SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x285
Is there any guidance on how to spot the cause? Here's what I have done so far
run racket with gdb - as gdb racket
In the gdb console.
Sweet! Thanks for the link.
--
Chad Albers
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The new package system supports this much more directly because
> packages are often hosted directly in repositories. Take a look at:
>
> http://pkg.racket-lang.org/#[zeromq]
>
>
process to keep growing and
growing? I've even managed to get it to crash.
--
Chad Albers
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Hi,
It would be really convenient there were links to source repositories
for Planet pages such as this:
http://planet.racket-lang.org/display.ss?package=zeromq.plt&owner=jaymccarthy
There are several advantages to this: It encourages others to
contribute to those projects; it allows users to vie
Thanks for everyone's advice. I think I will take it and find another
solution. Thanks!
--
Chad Albers
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote:
> Generally these kinds of macros are not a good idea, because it's
> difficult to combine them with other macro
I'm still trying to grok macros - which are amazing, but hard. I'd like to
know if it is possible capture part of the following expression
(display (+ 2 (bar (+ 1 2
if "bar" is a literal in the macro, I would like to capture body0 as (+ 1
2) and body1 as (display (+ 2 ...)).
This is a total
ts failed. And then depending on the verbosity setting
of (run-test), I get even more output. If I decide to automate my
test suite, that adds a new layer of complication. I'm still working
out my guard-rackunit plans (if I have any).
Chad
--
Chad Albers
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:47 AM,
Hi,
I'm exploring rolling my tests into the source files they cover using
the (module+ test...) form.
Can I include (test-suite ...) statements in the module, and if so,
how do I get it to work? I've haven't managed to get it to work with
raco test.
Thanks,
--
Chad
Racket
27;m going to try to
come up with something Racket users can use outside of Dr. Racket -
because I don't think I can support it using an existing framework
like guard. If I'm successful, I'll open-source release it.
Thanks,
Chad
--
Chad Albers
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Laur
As a Ruby engineer, we have a wonderful tool called "guard" that
automatically runs our unit-tests every time a test-case changes or
every-time a source file changes.
I have written a guard plugin that performs the same task for Racket's
rackunit. Currently, it pretty primitive - guard runs all t
et both add their own context tracking
> independent of the way that Racket is compiled, but that context is not
> reflected via `continuation-mark-set->context'.)
>
> At Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:37:13 +0900, Chad Albers wrote:
>> I'm using Debian Linux.
>> --
>> C
add
a certain overhead to executing a program. I'm just not used to a
language, not supporting stack traces by default. Is that just the
way that Racket works?
--
Chad Albers
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> By 64 bit architecture, I assume it is an intel/amd c
Debian bug reports on racket, and nothing similar has been
reported.
Thanks again for your help,
Chad
--
Chad Albers
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> Two days ago, Michael Wilber wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, by default, Racket doesn't
It doesn't produce a stack trace of DrRacket.
Also, it doesn't produce a stack trace if I include the errortrace on
the command line.
:(
--
Chad Albers
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Michael Wilber wrote:
> If I understand correctly, by default, Racket doesn't provide
I'm using Debian Linux.
--
Chad Albers
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> What platform are you using?
>
> If it's Win64, the problem is likely Racket's weak support for getting
> a backtrace on that platform (when the JIT is enabled).
>
n 24, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> A few minutes ago, Chad Albers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there some sort of 'secret' to acquiring the stack trace of an
>> exception? It is my understanding that when an exception is raised
>> with the 'erro
Hi,
Is there some sort of 'secret' to acquiring the stack trace of an
exception? It is my understanding that when an exception is raised
with the 'error' procedure in creates a exn:fail structure that has a
message field and a continuation-marks field. Presumably the stack
trace is in the conti
Thanks Eli!
--
Chad Albers
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> About two weeks ago, Chad Albers wrote:
>> Thanks Eli. I'm happy you recognize the issue.
>>
>> I did write my own string-trim-both function using Racket's regexp as
>> follo
e).)
>
> My $0.02,
> Robby
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, Chad Albers wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on project to port the Ruby Rack framework to Racket scheme.
>> If you're not familiar with Rack, it creates a layer to manage the http
&
revent key collisions. I would like to avoid that.
Just wondering if anyone had an alternative suggestion.
--
Chad Albers
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>
> > In the Rack middleware in the chain, each piece of the middleware
> > receives a
> > hash
Hi,
I'm working on project to port the Ruby Rack framework to Racket scheme.
If you're not familiar with Rack, it creates a layer to manage the http
response/requests, and a level of abstraction to build a chained list of
middle ware clients - each calling the next in chain.
Switching from from
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 30 minutes ago, Chad Albers wrote:
> > I'm having a long running discussion with my colleagues about the
> > practically of scheme. I've argued that it is, and using Racket
> > Scheme to prove my point
27;s string API and is srfi 13.
--
Chad Albers
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Laurent wrote:
> What conflict do you have?
>
> The following works for me:
>
> #lang racket
> (require srfi/13) ; comment me
> (string->list "auie")
>
> whether or not y
Hi,
I'm having a long running discussion with my colleagues about the
practically of scheme. I've argued that it is, and using Racket Scheme to
prove my point. However, on the other side of the debate, I've noticed
that Racket's string API is missing what I consider to be a extremely
practical
.
Thanks again,
--
Chad Albers
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, Chad Albers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As a Ruby dev, I really like unit testing. I've been using RackUnit
> > to suits my needs. I was wondering, though, about how p
Hi,
As a Ruby dev, I really like unit testing. I've been using RackUnit to
suits my needs. I was wondering, though, about how people go about writing
their tests for Racket. Many of the functions that I write will not be
part of the public API that a want to share from a module. I can test the
Interesting...that worksbut in this case, the struct is purely a port,
since it has no other fields. an-i is not really an instance of a struct
i, but a definition that returns the value of an instance of a struct that
takes as its sole field value a port. IOW, it doesn't take as its only
fi
27;s impossible, then I'm trying to
understand why structs could be treated like ports, but then the data in
the port doesn't really have access to the field-values in the struct.
Thanks for your help,
--
Chad
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Apr
Hi,
I'm looking for an example of treating a struct like a port, which appears
to be possible:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/portstructs.html?q=struct#(def._((quote._~23~25kernel)._prop~3ainput-port))
Apparently, this is a lot easier that using make-custom-port. What I
would like to do
Hi,
Great project and benchmarks. I, too, want to use Racket Scheme for more
serious projects, and even have my company's go ahead to incorporate it
into our service architecture. I'm pursuing the mongrel2 option, and I
just produced a beta mongrel2 racket adapter in pursuit of that goal.
https
Hi,
To teach myself Racket scheme (which I now Iove), I wrote an adapter to
the mongrel2 webserver. I just open-sourced the code on github. Once I
add unit testing and scribble documentation, I might try have it accepted
into planet racket, if anyone thinks it would be of interest.
http://git
32 matches
Mail list logo
