>
>
> They say that Racket is slow. I would like to know who are "they".
>
> Racket can be surprising. For example - our GUI application on RPi has a
> start-up time of 24s... But when we compile it using `raco exe`, it goes
> down under 2s including some hardware setup the program does. Usuall
First of all, Thank you to the team for making such a fantastic system
available for the rest of us. I don't know what I'd have done without it.
As a very long time Schemer/Racketeer/Lisper and a consistent industry
practitioner (I have used Chez Scheme and Racket as critical parts of every
o
Does the profiler work as expected in Racket CS? I'm getting the total time
taken, but the detailed profile has little useful information. If not, Is
there a way to get better profiling information in CS?
Best,
Anurag.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
t; here:
>
> http://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/about.html
>
>
> At Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:54:14 -0700, Anurag Mendhekar wrote:
> > Thanks for the detailed response, and apologies for the confusion regarding
> > the nomenclature. I did use the new package system, but in my he
Oct 2015 17:35:44 -0700 (PDT), Anurag Mendhekar wrote:
> > Having just submitted my first contribution to Planet
>
> [Note: We use the name "Planet" for an older package system. I see that
> you uploaded a package in the new system; assuming that you didn't also
> uploa
Having just submitted my first contribution to Planet, I am struggling with a
couple of things:
1. My module is an FFI which requires a specific library. Quite obviously, the
building daemon fails (because it doesn't have this library). But, it seems
like this a mischaracterization of the packa
Hi All,
I'm embarking on a rather ambitious neural network project and would very much
like to avoid python/numpy/theano route and stay within Racket.
The only aspect that is giving me pause is that I expect my network will be
large enough that I would have to use GPU acceleration for it to
I'm getting the following on Racket v5.1.3. on a Ubuntu 64bit Intel machine:
mvdev@DEV12042-VM:~/Dev/CDPOP/tools$ raco exe cdpop-test.ss
mvdev@DEV12042-VM:~/Dev/CDPOP/tools$ ./cdpop-test --help
read failed to read all 884959650 bytes from file
/media/sf_Dev/CDPOP/tools/./cdpop-test
Aborted (core
t mathematics. One
of my goals of doing this in Scheme is to bring that elegance into real
implementations.
(OK, probably not the best discussion for this forum, but I thought I'd share
my thinking :-)
Best,
A.
From: Matthias Felleisen
To: Anurag
, I'm assuming we can restrict ourselves
to typed racket only where it really matters so that we can move back-and-forth
between typed and untyped racket.
Best,
A.
From: Eli Barzilay
To: Anurag Mendhekar
Cc: "users@racket-lang.org"
Sent: Thu
I'm considering writing an H.264 encoder/decoder in Racket. Has anyone tried
such a thing before?
Codecs require a lot of bit-whacking and the h264 standard is particularly
convoluted. Efficiencies are obtained in C in many different and usually
complex ways. Codec experts usually recommend
I'm having trouble understanding how .racketrc works. I'm trying to define
the character λ to be 'lambda' as follows to be globally available, through
the .racketrc.
(define-syntax λ
(syntax-rules ()
((_ args body ...)
(lambda args body ...
This first basic attempt of adding
12 matches
Mail list logo
