Re: [racket] Would someone prefer paredit shortcuts?

option in preferences. > >> On Tuesday, December 31, 2013, 钟 wrote: >> >>> According to the document, Command is mapped to Meta when >>> 'map-command-as-meta-key' produces #t, or we can use "d:" for command. >>> It should be better to se

Re: [racket] Would someone prefer paredit shortcuts?

Thank you very much, Piotr. I don't have a Mac now, so I have no chance to do test on Mac by myself.Thank you for your help. According to the document, Command is mapped to Meta when 'map-command-as-meta-key' produces #t, or we can use "d:" for command. It should be better to set it to #t by def

Re: [racket] Would someone prefer paredit shortcuts?

s like you haven't uploaded it to http://pkgs.racket-lang.org Afterwards, users just have to install it via the GUI (in the File menu) or via the command line with: raco pkg install This will do in one step the 3 steps you mention in your README. Laurent On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 8:22

Re: [racket] Would someone prefer paredit shortcuts?

On Dec 27, 2013, at 11:03 AM, 钟 wrote: I used to write lisp code in emacs and enjoy paredit-mode.I tried to find an alternative for DrRacket but found nothing, so I decided to do it on my own. I has written a prototype in one day at https://github.com/yjqww6/drracket-paredit , and impleme

[racket] Would someone prefer paredit shortcuts?

I used to write lisp code in emacs and enjoy paredit-mode.I tried to find an alternative for DrRacket but found nothing, so I decided to do it on my own. I has written a prototype in one day at https://github.com/yjqww6/drracket-paredit , and implemented Depth-Changing, Barfage & Slurpage shor