At Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:57:29 -0800 (PST), "thomas_d...@alumni.brown.edu" wrote:
> So what happens from the perspective of embedding C code if an exception
> occurs in Racket code it calls?
It's not defined. In certain cases, control will escape from the C
code, I think, but it depends on how the
Thanks! A couple follow-up questions inline.
On Monday, December 20, 2021 at 2:34:29 PM UTC-5 Matthew Flatt wrote:
> There's not really anything you can do to catch exception C-side right
> now. If you need to catch exceptions, that has to be done Racket-side,
> possibly with a helper created v
At Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:58:06 -0700 (PDT), "thomas_d...@alumni.brown.edu" wrote:
> - What are the preconditions and error-handling setup for calling
> `racket_dynamic_require` and/or other `racket_*` functions?
There's not really anything you can do to catch exception C-side right
now. If you need
Gently bumping this thread in the hopes it might get some new eyes.
On Friday, November 5, 2021 at 11:58:07 AM UTC-4
thomas_d...@alumni.brown.edu wrote:
> I have some fairly simple code setting up an embedded Racket BC instance
> in a C++ coroutine, allowing me to call `scheme_dynamic_require`
Sage Gerard writes:
> Core team,
>
> Sam asked me to issue bans for a troublesome spammer. I've done so, even
> just today. I understand I need quorum for larger decisions. This is why
> I have not yet reconfigured the list to permanently stop the spammer.
> After researching the problem further,
Thanks George,I got it now and after some experimenting have seen what you describe.Jos PS,I do close the port after killing the thread and deleting the file. I came across this because I have an object that is written on about two pages with sharing enabled, but takes more than GBs to write withou
6 matches
Mail list logo
