Re: [racket-users] eq? behavior changed on Racket CS?

Yes, this is an expected difference. The Racket documentation still only promises `eq?` for characters with scalar values in the range 0 to 255, but Chez Scheme characters are always `eq?` when they are `eqv?`. At Thu, 20 May 2021 19:17:04 -0400, Stephen Chang wrote: > Hi everyone, Has eq? behavio

[racket-users] eq? behavior changed on Racket CS?

Hi everyone, Has eq? behavior changed with Racket CS? (ie, 8.0+) Specifically: $ racket79/bin/racket Welcome to Racket v7.9 [bc]. > (eq? (integer->char 955) (integer->char 955)) #f $ plt/racket/bin/racket Welcome to Racket v8.1.0.6 [cs]. > (eq? (integer->char 955) (integer->char 955)) #t Is thi

Re: [racket-users] Freenode -> libera.chat

I don’t use IRC much/ever - but in the event the irc links need to change from freenode, links are present in the following places: 1. Homepage 2. https://racket-lang.org/irc-chat.html 3. Wiki - github 4. Reddit - mod access required Current text: #racket IRC

Re: [racket-users] Freenode -> libera.chat

https://web.archive.org/web/20210520002957/http://kline.sh/ is a good starting point. On 20 May 2021, 15:12, at 15:12, David Storrs wrote: >What happened with Freenode? > >On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:12 AM Tony Garnock-Jones < >to...@leastfixedpoint.com> wrote: > >> On 5/20/21 1:28 PM, Paulo Matos

Re: [racket-users] Freenode -> libera.chat

What happened with Freenode? On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:12 AM Tony Garnock-Jones < to...@leastfixedpoint.com> wrote: > On 5/20/21 1:28 PM, Paulo Matos wrote: > > Tony Garnock-Jones writes: > >> With the recent damage to the Freenode IRC network, a new `#racket` has > >> been founded on irc.libera.

Re: [racket-users] Freenode -> libera.chat

On 5/20/21 1:28 PM, Paulo Matos wrote: Tony Garnock-Jones writes: With the recent damage to the Freenode IRC network, a new `#racket` has been founded on irc.libera.chat. Is this to become the canonical IRC chat room for Racket? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'd be in favour of moving off Freenode, myself. Wh

Re: [racket-users] Freenode -> libera.chat

Tony Garnock-Jones writes: > Just a heads up, > > With the recent damage to the Freenode IRC network, a new `#racket` has > been founded on irc.libera.chat. > > I've moved over there (nick `tonyg` still) and deleted my Freenode account > (such as it was). Is this to become the canonical IRC c

[racket-users] Freenode -> libera.chat

Just a heads up, With the recent damage to the Freenode IRC network, a new `#racket` has been founded on irc.libera.chat. I've moved over there (nick `tonyg` still) and deleted my Freenode account (such as it was). Cheers, Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: [racket-users] I want a package at installation scope but also to keep my install clean

Hm, I think maybe i will just abort this effort on my system since it seems like Matthew is already kinda working on making this exact thing better (as he said earlier) at https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/dfbb7040a I'll just use user scope now and wait until this kind of thing is explicit

Re: [racket-users] I want a package at installation scope but also to keep my install clean

To be clear: "/opt/Racket/Racket 8.1" is the system racket which the unprivileged user cannot write. "/opt/Racket/Packages/8.1" is a unprivileged-writable directory intended for use as a package destination. Nate > On May 20, 2021, at 3:55 AM, Nathaniel W Griswold > wrote: > > Oh, and i'll

Re: [racket-users] I want a package at installation scope but also to keep my install clean

Oh, and i'll just duplicate the issue here for Matthew / the Racket side since it could just be racket related: The errors i ran into are when using a custom PLTCONFIGDIR with this config.rktd: --- #hash((build-stamp . "") (catalogs . ("https://download.racket-lang.org/relea

Re: [racket-users] I want a package at installation scope but also to keep my install clean

Sam, Yes, the tool and PLTCONFIGDIR help me better control things. I think the tool is helpful. I ran into a problem with racket trying to delete files and posted it on github at https://github.com/samdphillips/raco-pkg-env/issues/3 I don't think it's really a raco-pkg-env issue, though, i gues