Re: [racket-users] fluent: unix style pipes and lambda shorthand to make your code more readable

> > > It might be nice to use ~> and ~>> (or |> and |>> or choose your own) as > > > infix > > > to avoid clashing with >. I'm thinking about changing the default operators to ~> and ~~> and making the unicode versions available using (require fluent/unicode). I actually prefer the long arrow f

Re: [racket-users] fluent: unix style pipes and lambda shorthand to make your code more readable

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 09:44:15AM -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Hi, are you aware of rash? Different goals but perhaps a merger of your > package with rash would give us a heck of a new shell :-) Hey, I took a look at rash, but racket (with fluent) turned out to be better suited to my