Re: [racket-users] SRFI 216 "SICP Prerequisites" vs #lang sicp

> Den tir. 9. mar. 2021 kl. 20.38 skrev Tim Lee : > >> I noticed that SRFI 216 "SICP Prerequisites" reached "final" status in >> January 2021. How will this affect #lang sicp? What are the differences >> between these two SICP aids? >> >> SRFI 216 link: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-216/srfi-216

Re: [racket-users] fluent: unix style pipes and lambda shorthand to make your code more readable

Impressive! How does fluent manage this infixing from a (require ...) rather than a #lang? I've been using the Clojure-like threading package for a while now and this has some nice advantages that are mentioned in the docs, like blending the first arg > and last arg >> variants easily in a sequen

Re: [racket-users] SRFI 216 "SICP Prerequisites" vs #lang sicp

Den tir. 9. mar. 2021 kl. 20.38 skrev Tim Lee : > I noticed that SRFI 216 "SICP Prerequisites" reached "final" status in > January 2021. How will this affect #lang sicp? What are the differences > between these two SICP aids? > > SRFI 216 link: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-216/srfi-216.html > #l

[racket-users] SRFI 216 "SICP Prerequisites" vs #lang sicp

I noticed that SRFI 216 "SICP Prerequisites" reached "final" status in January 2021. How will this affect #lang sicp? What are the differences between these two SICP aids? SRFI 216 link: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-216/srfi-216.html #lang sicp link: https://docs.racket-lang.org/sicp-manual/SICP

Re: [racket-users] fluent: unix style pipes and lambda shorthand to make your code more readable

> Using *fluent*, the same racket code can be written according to the UNIX > philosophy: > > ("data.txt" > file->lines >> filter (line : line > string-contains? > "active") >> map (line : line > string-split > list-ref 4) > > remove-duplicates > sort) This reminds me of Clojure's threadin

Re: [racket-users] fluent: unix style pipes and lambda shorthand to make your code more readable

This is very cool. You might take a look at the `threading` module for additional ideas: https://docs.racket-lang.org/threading/index.html On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:20 AM Roger Keays wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently publish a new package called *fluent* which adds some syntax > enhancements to R

Re: [racket-users] fluent: unix style pipes and lambda shorthand to make your code more readable

I like this a lot! Great job! -- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io Vincit qui se vincit. On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:20 AM Roger Keays wrote: > > Hi all, > > I recently publish a new package called *fluent* which adds some syntax > enhancements to

[racket-users] fluent: unix style pipes and lambda shorthand to make your code more readable

Hi all, I recently publish a new package called *fluent* which adds some syntax enhancements to Racket. Links and README below. Let me know what you think... Roger https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/fluent https://github.com/rogerkeays/racket-fluent/ # fluent UNIX style pipes and a lambda s