> On Nov 8, 2020, at 2:58 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 12:47:11PM -0800, unlimitedscolobb wrote:
>> The idea of having structs whose fields contain functions has never occurred
>> to me ...
>
> Historical note:
>
> I first encountered structures containing function i
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 12:47:11PM -0800, unlimitedscolobb wrote:
> Thank you for you answer! I'll need to think more about it. The idea of
> having structs whose fields contain functions has never occurred to me, but
> it may actually fit my relatively simple use case (and the planned
> migra
Thank you for you answer! I'll need to think more about it. The idea of
having structs whose fields contain functions has never occurred to me, but
it may actually fit my relatively simple use case (and the planned
migration to Typed Racket).
-
Sergiu
On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:22:16 PM
The typical use case for classes in Racket is writing GUIs, and that's
mostly because the GUI framework is class based.
For most other use cases, generics are a better choice than classes.
They're simpler and have a less intrusive effect on your API surface. If
you don't need to support arbitra
ACM SIGPLAN 2021 International Conference on Compiler Construction (CC 2021)
Co-located with CGO, HPCA and PPoPP
Tue 2 - Wed 3 March 2021
https://conf.researchr.org/home/CC-2021
CALL FOR PAPERS
The International Conference on Compiler Construction (CC) is
interested in work on processing programs
Hi,
A general knowledge question: what would be the typical use cases of Racket
generics vs. the typical use cases of Racket classes?
Am I correct in assuming that I can do everything with classes what I could
do with generics, and that generics have made their way into the language
before the
6 matches
Mail list logo
