Re: [racket-users] Developing Scribble as a user when Scribble is installed system-wide

Matthew Flatt writes: > At Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:01:36 -0500, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: >> I'm guessing it's probably due to these error messages: >> >> $ raco pkg update --scope user --clone scribble-lib >> Inferred package name from given `--clone' path >> package: scribble-lib >> give

Re: [racket-users] Developing Scribble as a user when Scribble is installed system-wide

At Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:01:36 -0500, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > I'm guessing it's probably due to these error messages: > > $ raco pkg update --scope user --clone scribble-lib > Inferred package name from given `--clone' path > package: scribble-lib > given path: scribble-lib > raco pkg

Re: [racket-users] Developing Scribble as a user when Scribble is installed system-wide

Thanks for your help Sam (and for trying to help me on IRC earlier, even though I still apparently haven't understoood). It looks like via that command, I really don't have anything installed: $ raco pkg show -l --rx scribble Installation-wide: Package[*=auto] Checksum

Re: [racket-users] Developing Scribble as a user when Scribble is installed system-wide

Can you post the output of `raco pkg show -l --rx scribble`? Sam On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:10 PM Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > > I've done the following to my git repo of scribble: > > raco pkg update --scope user --clone scribble-lib > raco pkg update --scope user --clone scribble-doc >

[racket-users] Racket FAQ

Hi All, there is a Racket FAQ on the wiki! https://github.com/racket/racket/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Questions I've just updated it so let me know if I've got anything wrong? Racket FAQ > >- Is Racket compiled? > >

Re: [racket-users] bf program benchmark

BTW, I thought Racket CS could run faster, but it is not. It took 32s to finish. sleepnova 於 2020年11月5日 週四 下午5:50 寫道： > Thanks for sharing this article. After applying the "all macro" > optimization[1], the execution time reduce to 22s, which beats the Java one! > The modified version is here[2]

Re: [racket-users] bf program benchmark

Thanks for sharing this article. After applying the "all macro" optimization[1], the execution time reduce to 22s, which beats the Java one! The modified version is here[2]. If anyone knows any optimization opportunities, please let me know. I would like to optimize further if possible! [1] https