> On Aug 30, 2019, at 1:19 AM, Philip McGrath wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> This is interesting! A number of people have wanted conveniences around
> `keyword-apply` and accepting the same keywords as some other function. (The
> trouble is, different people have different ideas of what those conve
Just checked out the gather space. It looks very cool. How about some easter
eggs?
John
> On Oct 9, 2020, at 7:07 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> To the friends and followers of Racket,
>
> You have produced thousands of commits since last Con. You have honored your
> ancestors and brought glory
Here is an example that provides different colors for some particular
forms such as define, require, lambda etc. However, these forms
('keywords') are recognized literally by the lexer instead of
semantically as in Check Syntax. Therefore it will classify
non-keywords as keywords from time to time.
On 10/9/2020 10:11 AM, Adam El Mazouari wrote:
An example is this:
(define (square-all lst) (if (null? lst)
'()
(cons (square (car lst))
(square-all (cdr lst)
As you can see, you've got:
* methods included by default (define, cons)
* booleans (null?)
* user-introduced vars (lst)
If you'd like to see different colors for imported identifiers, then
you can click the "Check Syntax" button in DrRacket. The attached
picture shows what it looks like.
Note that there's not a difference between `cons` and `null?` because
those are both functions.
You can adjust the particular co
... and what is this thing exactly?
--Adam.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 4:15 PM Jason Hemann wrote:
> https://racket-mode.com/
>
>
>
> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
> JBH
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 10:12 AM Adam El Mazouari <
> adam.elmazou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> An example is this:
>>
>> (define (square-all
Great! Thanks for the pointer to the docs.
On Friday, October 9, 2020 at 6:04:31 AM UTC-7 Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Thu, 8 Oct 2020 22:38:04 -0700 (PDT), primer wrote:
> > I'm new to Racket and have not yet played with Racket CS. My question is
> > whether the Chez Scheme libraries are availabl
An example is this:
(define (square-all lst) (if (null? lst)
'()
(cons (square (car lst))
(square-all (cdr lst)
As you can see, you've got:
- methods included by default (define, cons)
- booleans (null?)
- user-introduced vars (lst)
shown in the same color. It's really not clear.
To the friends and followers of Racket,
You have produced thousands of commits since last Con. You have honored
your ancestors and brought glory to Racket. RacketCon is next weekend, from
Friday to Sunday, come and see.
https://con.racket-lang.org/
Kathi Fisler will keynote, and we will hear abo
Can you give an example of which things you'd like to be different? We
usually use "variable" and "identifier" for very similar meanings when
discussing Racket, for example.
Sam
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:16 AM Adam El Mazouari
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I've started using DrRacket a couple of
At Thu, 8 Oct 2020 22:38:04 -0700 (PDT), primer wrote:
> I'm new to Racket and have not yet played with Racket CS. My question is
> whether the Chez Scheme libraries are available. For example, is it
> possible to do something like (require chezscheme) and then use
> (fork-thread ...) to creat
Hello everyone.
I've started using DrRacket a couple of weeks ago and I can't get used to
the color theme. Variables, identifiers, methods, all of them are in blue.
It's really unintuitive. Does anybody know a good plugin that
differentiates these in a clear way for the human eye?
Or, if you
Hi,
When I am using DrRacket recently, I often find myself wanting to go back
to the last edit location which I can do in other editors. However, I did
not find a similar function in DrRacket. Is there a way to do this? With a
plugin maybe?
Rock
--
You received this message because you are subs
13 matches
Mail list logo
