Re: [racket-users] in-directory sorted results

I created a PR for a possible fix for this. I am unsure if the (directory-list) implementation in kw-file.rkt needs to be calling sort. Evan On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 3:05:55 AM UTC-10 evdubs wrote: > Sorry, I cherry-picked the doc example as an

Re: [racket-users] slideshow -> google slides?

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 06:58:28PM -0400, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote: > Has anyone here developed a reasonable workflow for exporting slideshow > presentations to google slides? It appears that google slides cannot import > PDFs or SVGs. It looks like it has support for importing PPT

Re: [racket-users] Proposal: GitHub Issue Triage Party

That sounds great. I'm happy to help. I created the #triage channel on slack, which is a good place to chat about this. I'm happy to help people figure out issues that should be closed, or reassigned, as you've started to do. And creating a specific time to work on this would also be great. A note

[racket-users] Proposal: GitHub Issue Triage Party

Digging through some of the older Issues in https://github.com/racket/racket/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-asc there appear to be many stale issues that may no longer be applicable or have been silently resolved in commits that were not cross-linked. I've started to respond to

Re: [racket-users] slideshow -> google slides?

From https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2008/02/19/why-are-the-microsoft-office-file-formats-so-complicated-and-some-workarounds/ about the old formats: > *These are binary formats, so loading a record is usually a matter of just copying (blitting) a range of bytes from disk to memory, where you end u

[racket-users] slideshow -> google slides?

Has anyone here developed a reasonable workflow for exporting slideshow presentations to google slides? It appears that google slides cannot import PDFs or SVGs. It looks like it has support for importing PPT files, unsurprisingly, but AFAIK slideshow won’t export ppt files. I have no idea how

[racket-users] Re: Strange performance behavior

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT), "wanp...@gmail.com" wrote: >I was working on a exercism problem named Raindrops. > > : > >I thought version 1 would be faster, but it turned out to be wrong. Running >with raco test got following timing information. > >version 1 >cpu time: 9 real time: